The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 772 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I have no further questions, and I think that the minister has already been here for six minutes longer than scheduled.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2022
Jenni Minto
When Hugh Dignon most recently gave evidence, we asked about a person using two dogs alongside another person using two dogs, and how those dogs might criss-cross. Will you confirm for the record again how you see the bill ensuring that the activity is connected with the right person? If the four dogs belonging to the two people are working together, how do you see the bill supporting or otherwise that activity?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2022
Jenni Minto
You talked about migrating birds coming from eastern Europe and from further north—from Greenland and Iceland. What connections do you have with our critical friends in Europe?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Thank you for your evidence, Sheila Voas. My question was on the housing criteria that you decide upon, and you have covered that in many of your responses so far. I am also interested in the combined meetings that you have with the chief veterinary officers from across Great Britain and in whether you use the same targets, balances or numbers in each of the criteria. Is that consistent across the nations?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Thank you, minister. The evidence that we received during the round-table meeting last week showed that there needs to be direct control of the dogs and, if a dog started to chase, the control that the dog handler had would result in that dog stopping. Is that right?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Jenni Minto
It is a bit crystal ball.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I would like to explore what Julie Hesketh-Laird has just talked about. Donna Fordyce touched on it as well, in her evidence about how businesses had to change and about what did not happen as a result, because they were having to look at the new ways of doing things. For Food Standards Scotland, it was what you would not be able to do if you were having to spend the time on this.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Would there be a concern that if a definition was too narrow, it could have unexpected consequences?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I am sorry, convener, but I was hoping to hear from Robbie Marsland.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Thank you all for your evidence so far.
I want to return to the bill’s title—the Hunting with Dogs (Scotland) Bill—and its references to
“hunting a wild mammal using a dog”.
All the definitions that we have heard on rough shooting today have used the word “flushing”, not “hunting”. You might have inadvertently used the word “hunting” yourself, convener, when you were giving the example of your four Labs, but you then corrected yourself.
As I understand it—and please correct me if I am wrong—the exception in section 3 allows someone to
“search for, stalk or flush from cover”.
That is basically what we are talking about as rough shooting. I would like clarification that my understanding of that is correct.
The other area that I want to ask about relates to something that Jake Swindells has just said about the definition of “a pack”. Again, section 3 requires that
“reasonable steps are taken to ensure that any dog used in the activity does not join with others to form a pack of more than two dogs”.
To me, that implies that “a pack” is more than two dogs—in other words, three dogs.
DS Telford, it would be interesting to get your thoughts on the reference to “reasonable steps”, and I would also like to hear views on that from Robbie Marsland and from one of the witnesses who are shooters, whether it be Ross Ewing or Jake Swindells.