Seòmar agus comataidhean

We will get the information from that work when we evaluate the outcomes of those opt-out pilots.

I whole-heartedly endorse what Maggie Chapman said about television, film and adverts. When I think about where my knowledge came from, it was from the films “Philadelphia” and “Dallas Buyers Club”. You spoke about dramas, and “EastEnders” had that kind of storyline. That is important. In the online age, short pieces can also be helpful, which is why the Terrence Higgins Trust film really cut through. It was short and hard hitting, but the message was absolutely clear. As I said earlier, we are doing some work to gather information on that to see how it has worked, and we will keep that in mind if we have further plans for whatever awareness raising that we feel needs to be done.

As I said earlier, I represent one of Scotland’s rural constituencies. I have had conversations that are similar to some of the evidence that you heard.

I always think that there is an interesting balance to take in rural communities. Because of the stigma, some people are happier travelling to a larger population centre for their treatment. We have to bear that in mind when we are looking at the situation.

In the committee’s previous evidence session, Dr Howe gave strong anecdotal evidence about how she operates and how things operate in Highland. It is important to recognise that, alongside the delivery plan, we have done some work to look at rural inequalities and how we can ensure that the service that people in those areas get is the same as we would expect in the larger centres and is person centred. I think that that work will be published later this week.

The committee also heard from Professor Estcourt about the amazing work that is being doing with regard to ePrEP. Again, that could work well to support people in rural communities.

Have I covered everything, Rebekah Carton?

I appreciate that we published the plan just this morning. If the committee has any further questions about it and wants to write to us, we would be very happy to have a dialogue in that way.

On resources, we have set aside £1.7 million for the whole HIV plan within this element of Government. The committee heard very clear evidence that resources are tight for this. I am reflecting on that. That is why it is so important that we get the spending on this right. There will be more information coming out on how we decide to spend the money, but we appreciate that we have a tight budget.

I put on record the amazing collaboration that happens among the third sector, academics, health boards and the Government. That came across really strongly in your two evidence sessions in the previous meeting. I like to say that they are our critical friends, and I think that we work very well together. I really appreciate their hard work. They know their community so well. Dr Clutterbuck reflected on that in his evidence.

We must remember that the pilots are happening in busy A and E departments. We do not want to introduce, for long periods of time, additional stresses in areas that are already very stressed. We felt that we could get the answers from the time periods that we set.

It is important that we recognise that pilots are also happening in England. The data that comes out of those, as well as the data that comes out of Scotland, will be considered so that we can see the bigger picture.

That is one of the things that we are looking at. If I am correct—Rebekah Carton will correct me if I am wrong—currently, clinics have to prescribe PrEP. We are taking forward work on how we can widen the prescribing of PrEP so that GPs can do it. We are doing scoping work in NHS Grampian with GPs to find out how open they are to doing that and how we can make it work in the best way possible for them and for the people who will be prescribed PrEP.

I acknowledge and have reflected on the evidence that was given to us about the gaps in specific areas. The plan that we have launched today supports the need to find ways to increase data gathering.

We also need to recognise—I might refer to rural communities, but this can also be across other sections of the population—that, because the numbers in Scotland are so small, we need to make sure that we gather and report that data in the best way so that people cannot be identified and we do not create a knock-on effect on stigma.

Dr Kirsty Roy talked about the work that Public Health Scotland is doing to create a dashboard to ensure that we get the best information, and I am fully behind that. Paul O’Kane is right about how different health boards have different pockets of information and we need to pool that, so part of the plan is a national Scotland-wide audit of HIV contact tracing, which I hope will help to feed into that.

The plan specifically includes work to support data gathering, as well as working closely with Public Health Scotland to ensure that we get the right information and that it is produced in the right way.

That is a helpful question. It gets to the nub of stigma, in that we cannot account for where it will happen. We hope that training will ensure that people deal with people in the way that they would expect to be dealt with, whatever their circumstances. I will take that question away and come back to the committee with a much clearer response.

I will also reflect on what I was saying about the issue’s importance in education settings. In some respects, you might find that teachers are learning from their pupils and that different conversations are now happening. The work regarding health boards that we highlighted could be replicated in local authority areas. For example, a couple of months ago, I was at an event about breastfeeding and heard how the local council—I think that it was North Lanarkshire Council; I sometimes get my Lanarkshires mixed up—had spent a lot of time working internally and with the health board to understand the best way to give training so as to provide a breastfeeding-friendly environment. We can certainly learn from such initiatives.

Changing the size of zones and creating new zones would require consultation to ensure that it is right to do so. That would also be done in discussion with the health boards because they make the decisions on where to locate their services. Earlier, I said that I would be interested to hear the committee’s views on maximums and minimums, recognising that provisions on those have been brought in in other jurisdictions.

The work that we have done has looked at evidence from all sides. We have taken strong cognisance of the evidence that has been given by women who have been impacted by walking past such demonstrations or vigils. I go back to the point that I made at the start, which is that the aim of the bill is to protect women who are accessing healthcare that women have been legally able to receive since 1967. The indications that we have heard and the evidence that you have received underline how distressing it can be for women.

In my opening statement, I highlighted that the first time that I came across that was in the early 2000s in Oregon and I saw how it impacted friends of mine, so I come at it from that perspective.