The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1351 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
Not at this stage.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I will bring in Michael Paparakis, who has the history of this. However, my understanding is that it was not thought necessary. Even if the legislation on data protection is updated, it will always be updated by the UK Government on the Information Commissioner’s Office website, so it will keep in step with things.
Michael, do you want to add anything?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I will hand over to Michael Paparakis, who has the technical knowledge to be able to answer that question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I do not consider the threshold to be too high; I believe that it strikes the right balance between the incurring of unnecessary costs and protecting an estate from the improper actings of a judicial factor.
The evidence indicates that bonds of caution can be difficult to obtain and can cost thousands of pounds each year, which is paid for by the estate. That can be prohibitive in circumstances in which a family member is appointed to administer the estate of a missing person and can be completely unnecessary where indemnity insurance covers the judicial factor’s actings.
Most current judicial factors are professionals with indemnity insurance, which, as the committee has heard, can cover their actings as a judicial factor. If a non-professional judicial factor is appointed, the court will have the discretion to order caution. The bill contains safeguards in relation to that, including the fact that all judicial factors are supervised by the accountant and that they must submit an inventory of the estate property and a management plan and must provide accounts for regular audit.
Any person who has concerns about a judicial factor can complain to the accountant, who is required to investigate and has the power to direct a judicial factor to do something. The accountant must also report any serious misconduct to the court.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
Good morning. Thank you, convener, for the opportunity to talk about strategic lawsuits against public participation—often referred to as SLAPPs. I would like to thank the petitioner, Roger Mullin, for his tireless campaigning work on this matter.
The petition raises important issues and it is helpful to have them discussed in such a forum. The committee will be aware that the Scottish Government recently introduced reforms to our law of defamation, which took steps towards further protecting freedom of expression.
Although SLAPPs are typically framed as defamation cases brought by wealthy individuals or corporations to evade scrutiny in the public interest, they can occur across a broad spectrum of issues, including data protection, privacy and environmental law.
Since Parliament considered the law of defamation, significant steps have been taken elsewhere in the United Kingdom and in the European Union. In England and Wales, the UK Government has given its support to a private member’s bill that will widen the scope of the limited anti-SLAPP legislation that is already in place. At EU level there is a recent directive, and the Council of Europe has recently adopted a recommendation on countering SLAPPs.
For those reasons, it is important that we make progress on the issue. I am pleased to say that we will consult on SLAPPs later this year. It seems to me to be both timely and sensible to consult on the issue of SLAPPs specifically in the context of Scots law. My officials have already had helpful engagement with stakeholders, and I will ensure that that continues throughout the consultation process.
I welcome any questions that you or other committee members might have.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I have been told that the board can consider it on a case-by-case basis.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I can double-check that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
Thank you. I am happy to keep the committee updated as we progress.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
The task force includes representatives from the UK Government and the EU, and I know that Scottish officials are part of it, too. By itself, legislation would not address all the potential issues that SLAPPs raise. There needs to be more of a holistic approach, which is why we are working with the task force.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Siobhian Brown
I will bring in Michael Paparakis to answer that question.