The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 527 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
Emma has helpfully covered mine.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
To go back to what Paula Fraser said about co-design, we know that people want a shared record, in whatever form that takes. The Scottish Government consultation showed that 86 per cent of people wanted that and they wanted it to be shared across platforms. However, Paula also said that people were anxious about what co-design would look like—what it would mean and whether they would have enough time. Would it be helpful to have further guidance from the Scottish Government about what it would look like, in order to offer reassurance that there will be time to have those important conversations about control of data, mental health issues and what might be shared and in what circumstances?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
I have rolled my questions into one large question because I knew that we were struggling for time. In evidence, we have heard that 72 per cent of respondents to the national care service consultation agreed that ministers should be accountable for the delivery of social care. Do you agree with that approach? What benefits do you foresee it bringing? Are there any risks that you would like to tell us about? I will go to Suzanne McGuinness first, and then anyone else who would like to come in.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
Good morning. The policy memorandum states that a national social work agency would be expected to provide
“national leadership, oversight, investment and support”
to the profession.
What functions should the agency perform that are not covered by other bodies or agencies? That question goes first to Alison Bavidge.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
Does anyone else want to come in on that one?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
I have one more question. I understand that the SSSC supports the creation of the new agency, so what do you foresee for your future, should it come into being?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
Thank you. You said earlier that Scotland’s developing a national care service is a “groundbreaking and world-leading” approach. Can you expand on that and tell us why that is the case?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
You will be pleased to hear that many of my questions have been answered, convener, as a lot has been said about co-design already. My focus, which ties in neatly to what we have just been speaking about, is on front-line staff, who are very busy. We have talked about the challenges, such as the pandemic and workload. How can we ensure that front-line staff are front and centre of the co-design? How can we ensure that they have the time to participate fully in what is happening? We have just heard that there will be significant time, but how do we ensure that they are at the front of that process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
The independent review highlighted that we should be moving toward accountability for social care lying with ministers instead of with local authorities. The Scottish public expect ministers to be accountable; that is a reasonable expectation, given the impact on national wellbeing. Can you outline the benefits that the move will have for Scottish people?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2022
Evelyn Tweed
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Shelter Scotland warmly welcomes the change and states that it will
“embed the ‘no wrong door’ approach”.
It also welcomes the use of a person-centred approach. Will the cabinet secretary comment further on the submission that Shelter has provided to the committee?