The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you, Martin.
If you have further questions, Emma, on you go.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I have a few questions before we finish. I apologise that we have run on slightly—we have had so much to get through. Do you have any concerns regarding the appointment of interim charity trustees, and are you satisfied that there is enough clarity around that provision? Should there be a dispute mechanism—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I thank all the witnesses for giving evidence this morning. I will briefly suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.
10:24 Meeting suspended.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Welcome back, everyone. I welcome to the meeting our second panel. Dr John Picton is a senior lecturer and member of the charity law and policy unit at the University of Liverpool; Nick Holroyd is a member of the Faculty of Advocates; Gavin McEwan is an executive committee member of the Charity Law Association; and Keith Macpherson is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland charities panel. All our witnesses have joined us in the room.
As I did for the first panel, I will quickly mention a couple of points about the format of the meeting. Please do not feel that you have to answer every question if you have nothing new to add. We have a lot to cover, so I ask you to keep your questions and answers as tight as possible.
Again, Pam Duncan-Glancy will begin the questioning.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Please continue, Emma.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Would any of the other witnesses like to respond?
11:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Do the witnesses agree that the bill’s proposals will not result in any additional costs for local authorities or charities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
John Picton, do you have anything to add?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you very much, everyone, for your evidence. Next week, we will continue to take evidence on the bill when we hear from the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government.
That concludes our public business.
11:31 Meeting continued in private until 11:35.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Welcome back, everyone. I welcome our second panel: Vicki Cahill, policy officer at Alzheimer Scotland; Mridul Wadhwa, the chief executive of Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre; and Rami Okasha, the chief executive of Children’s Hospices Across Scotland, who all join us in person. We also have Shona NicIllinein, the chief executive of Bòrd na Gàidhlig, who joins us remotely.
As with the first panel, I have a few points to mention about the format of the meeting. I apologise in advance for this. Please wait until I—or the member who is asking the question—say your name before speaking. Please allow our broadcasting colleagues just a few seconds to turn your microphone on before you begin to speak. You can indicate with an R in the dialogue box in BlueJeans or simply with a show of your hand if you wish to come in on a question. Please do not feel that you all have to answer every question—if you have nothing to add to what others have said, that is absolutely fine.
Before we begin, I put on record that Bòrd na Gàidhlig requested to give evidence in Gaelic this morning. The clerks have spoken with colleagues across the Parliament with a view to facilitating interpretation of this evidence session, but we have been informed that that is not possible due to various factors. The Parliament is aware that there is an issue and is acting to resolve it as new broadcasting systems come into operation. We are truly sorry for not being able to facilitate interpretation at our meeting on this occasion and recognise that that is an unfortunate situation.
I now pass over to our deputy convener, Emma Roddick, who will, in Gaelic, invite Bòrd na Gàidhlig to give a short introduction to its evidence in Gaelic. Afterwards, an interpretation in English will be provided before we hear from other witnesses.