The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
There are updated regulations in the bill that allow the hearings system to update the witness on when the outcome of the process will be available. We recognise that restorative justice seeks to ensure that the needs and voices of those who have been harmed are central. Obviously, that can support accountability and responsibility in relation to those children who cause harm.
The Scottish ministers are funding posts in the Children and Young People’s Centre for Justice to support the development of those restorative justice services, because we recognise that the requirements of those young people might differ in that regard. That work is under way and is a priority.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I think that we would absolutely like to work towards that but, at the moment, I am not entirely sure that it is logistically possible. The law requires that the police must take every precaution to ensure that a person is not unreasonably or unnecessarily held in police custody. At present, a number of incidents are dealt with in the community and there has been no need to arrest the children or bring them into police custody at all.
The Lord Advocate has issued guidelines on that issue separately. In deciding to bring a child into police custody, various factors are considered, including the rights of that specific child, the possibility of interference with victims or witnesses, the severity of the offence and the need to fully investigate the offence. There are factors that could impact on whether a child needs to be brought into police custody.
Currently, when an arrest is absolutely necessary, the police must, by law, take any arrested person, including a child, to a police station. That could be necessary to prevent further offending or to facilitate investigations, such as by capturing fingerprints, photographs or DNA. The decision to keep a person in custody must comply with the Lord Advocate’s guidelines.
What I am saying is that we would definitely like to work towards the position that you suggest, but that was not consulted on as part of the bill consultation, because there are logistical issues around how that would take place. It is something that we can certainly look at in the future.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
The UNCRC defines a child as under 18. As I said in my opening remarks, that has cross-party support. Sixteen and 17-year-olds are still children and have the best chance of being rehabilitated.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
There are inconsistencies.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I do not believe that a blanket definition of 16 for all the different things that you discuss is appropriate.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I do not like to speak in hypothetical terms. We have said that it will be possible.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
The proposal has been worked through and discussed. The process is on-going, so, if we see that there will be issues with capacity, the Scottish Government will absolutely—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As I said, we will continue to monitor the situation. I do not rule anything out. On your point, we are committed to funding the interventions for vulnerable youth service, which is hosted by Kibble, as you might be aware. IVY is a specialist psychological and social work service that provides three types of service: professional consultation and advice, psychological assessment and psychological intervention for children who are at risk of harming others. Such support can be given to those on the edge of secure care and to those in secure care settings. We are committed to that service.
As I said, I do not rule anything out as we go forward.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Secure care would be very much a last resort as an alternative to police custody. I would have to hand over to my officials to give the costings.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As I have said, the financial memo sets out the headline costs and was produced following in-depth engagement with partners and duty bearers. Given the nature of care and justice services, there is a high degree of variability.
As I have mentioned to other members, it is important to recognise the wider backdrop of the benefits that the change programmes could have to society. The negative economic and social costs to society of offending and crime are well documented. For example, the “Follow the Money” report, which is associated with the Promise, estimates that the cumulative private costs of crime, physical and emotional harm and lost output, as well as public service costs, are upwards of £3.9 billion. A huge amount of money is being spent in that regard. Although the costs in the financial memorandum look large, if you balance them against that other sum, you can see that there is real potential there.