The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you for the question. Logically, there absolutely has to be a cut-off somewhere. The bill raises the age of referral to the principal reporter to 18, but, as you mentioned, as detailed in the financial memorandum, due to the time taken for a referral to the reporter to progress matters and for the hearing to convene and put meaningful measures in place that can take effect, it is expected that the Lord Advocate, in reviewing the current guidelines, will consider whether a formalised cut-off age is needed so that an offence can still be appropriately dealt with.
We have said that someone could enter secure care up to their 19th birthday. That is to allow those children who might have received a short sentence just prior to their 18th birthday to not be put into a young offenders institution. That is a safeguard, but I am sure that you will agree that, because we are looking at the rights of a child, there has to be a cut-off somewhere. I would say that that is logical.
10:15Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I would say specifically that we will continue to monitor the situation—we will work with the secure care and local authorities; indeed, we are in discussion with them now—and that I am not shying away from it.
As I have said clearly—and the committee has heard strong evidence on this—the secure care centres have said that they are equipped to manage, and are comfortable with, the provision. The reimagining secure care project is under way and it might feed back into that.
It is not something that we are not looking at—we are working on the issue and are happy to take any feedback as we go on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
I do not want to pre-empt anything, but it could very well be the case that there are more MRCs following the enactment of the bill. To date, very few MRCs have been used in practice, which is perhaps due to the consistency of the test. As a result of there having been very few MRCs to date, there have been limited opportunities to assess or evaluate their use and effectiveness. However, as has already been detailed in evidence to the committee and via the call for views, it is recognised that, in certain circumstances, MRCs can be a very effective measure to support children to remain in the community.
As you said, secure care will be a very punitive measure, so the MRCs would allow them to stay in the community while being provided with intensive support and subject to appropriate restrictions on their movements.
The MRCs provide another option prior to final placement in a secure care setting.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As I said at the beginning, I do not believe that complexity—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
The new provisions that recognise the current criteria of injury are not necessarily a change but more a kind of redefinition. Injury always—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
There is. In my previous response, I advised that the scheduling of hearings for the reviews of MRCs will be prioritised, given the potential need to consider further restrictive measures.
On your point about the child, we absolutely do not want to put the onus on the child, which is why there will be on-going review. If any potential changes or further improvements can be made with regard to monitoring MRCs or evaluating their effectiveness, that is certainly something that can be taken forward. However, at the moment, because we are relying on such a limited number of MRCs, it is harder to give data on that or provide reassurance.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
The cut-off date has not been formalised yet, but it will be. We have said that, for safeguarding children, we have allowed the age to go up to 19 for entry into secure care centres. We are saying 17 and a half at the moment, but the cut-off date is not yet formalised.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
As I am very new to the role, that is not a conversation that I have had. I will pass over to my officials to speak about that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Natalie Don-Innes
Currently, trained practitioners and professionals are based in secure care centres, and specialists can be brought in to respond to the needs of children in their care. At the moment, there are no plans to change the legislation on access to health professionals, but officials are working with mental health colleagues to consider the specialist healthcare needs that many children in secure care might have and what additional support could be made available in the community. As I said, we will continue to monitor that throughout the bill’s passage and beyond.