Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1207 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

Thank you for your comments so far, minister.

From what I have heard today, I believe that, in order for local authorities to carry out those tasks in the best possible way, the regulations should be passed. They are essentially about empowering local authorities to create and implement a system that best works for their communities; we have talked a lot about that already.

Do you agree that empowering local authorities in that regard is a wholly positive move? Can you elaborate on the position of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities? I understand that COSLA broadly supports the regulations. Although we are talking about empowering local authorities, there has not been much discussion this morning about what they actually think. Can you provide any information on the support in principle from local authorities and leaders, perhaps cross-party leaders, across the different council areas?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Refugees and Asylum Seekers

Meeting date: 10 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

I want to say a truly heartfelt thanks to our witnesses. Your comments and responses have been very helpful.

I want to focus on the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme, which has received some criticism based on its limitations and eligibility criteria and the fact that the UK Government is including in the count the total number Afghan refugees who are currently in the UK. What are your views on eligibility for the scheme? I would like to start with Pinar Aksu.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Refugees and Asylum Seekers

Meeting date: 10 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

Good morning, panel. I direct my question to Graham O’Neill.

Graham, I thank you for your thorough response in your first comments, which were very helpful. I originally had some questions around contingency accommodation, but you have answered those. What is your assessment of why asylum decisions take so long? What can be done to address the backlog as a result? What impact does that have on those who are waiting for decisions?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

Thank you. I have no further questions, so I will pass back to the convener.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

It is important that we get this right, so I appreciate all your comments on the matter.

To round off, I have a question for all the witnesses. Are there any other specific transport-related improvements that could be made to the draft NPF4 that have not already been highlighted?

Paul White has responded last quite a few times, so I will bring him in first.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

In relation to the “additional public benefits” that are mentioned in policy 34(c), are you saying that you would rather see the policy strengthened so that woodland is protected? Are you saying that that is the most important thing as far as you are concerned?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

Good morning. I am interested in the discussion on the importance of equality issues. Some of the issues that I want to raise have been touched on in response to my colleague Jackie Dunbar’s question, but I want to expand on it.

Obviously, 20-minute neighbourhoods can mean very different things for different people, and I understand the sentiment that we need to reaffirm what a 20-minute neighbourhood is. I think that Dr Brown stated that it is not just about being able to nip out for a coffee but is about enabling people to meet the majority of their daily needs. The needs of a young person can be very different to the needs of a pregnant woman, an elderly person or a parent with young children. Outwith physical or mobility issues, the needs of families on low incomes also need to be recognised.

People have a range of needs. That relates to infrastructure and services, but transport is key. To ensure that 20-minute neighbourhoods are accessible for all, how can the needs be highlighted more and incorporated into planning, especially in rural areas? We touched on difficulties in that earlier.

I direct the question first to Dr Brown.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

Yes. I am sorry. I realise that it was quite a long question.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

I am not sure whether I came across right there. Policy 34(c) says that there are “additional public benefits” that would justify the removal of woodland. Are you saying that you would like the policy to be strengthened so that the removal of woodland would not be possible or would be an absolute last option?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

National Planning Framework (NPF4)

Meeting date: 8 February 2022

Natalie Don-Innes

That is no problem at all.

Iain, do you have anything to add?