The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Good morning to the panel. Given the large number of failures in the UK energy market despite the significant increase in energy bills, is Ofgem’s price cap fit for purpose? Will Ofgem’s proposals to boost resilience in the energy sector—for example, the proposals on financial stress testing for suppliers and on increasing the number of times a year that the price cap can be adjusted—have a material impact on the market?
I put that to Dan Alchin first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Good morning. A lot of my questions have already been answered, so I will try to keep this short.
Could the Scottish Government implement any additional policy solutions that could mitigate the worst impact of the increase—and the expected further increase—in the price cap, or are there any actions that the UK Government could take to assist in the crisis, such as increasing benefits, which was mentioned earlier? Could the UK Government go further in its dealings with Ofgem, for example by limiting the amount by which the cap could increase?
Alastair Wilcox touched on some of those points previously, so I ask Chris Birt to answer.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thanks, convener, and thank you to the panel—it is good to have you with us. I have a couple of questions.
We have touched on some of the priority groups already, such as single-parent families. Do you feel that the delivery plan has done enough to support employment for the priority groups? Do you feel that the Scottish Government has utilised its devolved powers fully in the plan? In your view, could efforts be enhanced further with the devolution of employment law? I put those questions to Bill Scott.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
That touches on one of my supplementary questions. You mentioned that employers are becoming a little bit more flexible in accommodating employees who might have childcare commitments or other issues—for example, by ensuring that people in poverty have financial support to enable them to afford the tools or clothes that they might need in their workplace or to get to work.
Can you reaffirm whether you feel that that is happening just now? Are employers giving that extra support and coming round to opening up those barriers for people?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
That was helpful. Obviously, there is a real focus on employability, but families in poverty must still be able to see their children, and a universal basic income would open up a bit more flexibility in that respect.
I ask Philip Whyte and Emma Congreve to answer the same question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you, Bill—you are pre-empting my questions, because my next question is about hybrid working. I absolutely agree with you. There are issues with different types of employment. Retail, for example, can be quite inflexible. We need to focus on covering all areas of employment so that there is flexibility across the board.
09:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you, Alison. I do not believe that anybody else wants to come in on that, so I will move on.
Witnesses have mentioned an emphasis on more and warmer social housing and more affordable housing, but are any other measures that could address child poverty missing from the plan for housing? That question goes first to Bill Scott.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
I absolutely agree. I have real concerns about people who are on key meters and who do not even have the option not to pay the electricity bill—they will go without completely. It is scary.
My next question was whether the panel feels that it would benefit householders if renewable energy that is generated in Scotland was not sold back to the National Grid but instead remained in Scotland. Again, Bill Scott has just answered that, so I have no further questions.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Do the witnesses feel that the policies that are included in the “Warm affordable homes” part of the plan have enough of a focus on tackling child poverty? For example, there is funding from Home Energy Scotland, which is going to provide £42 million in grants and loans to help with making homes warmer. However, we are now seeing what appears to be an ever-increasing cost of living and increasing fuel costs. To what extent might the policies be counteracted by those increases? I put that question to Alison Watson.
10:00Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
I will keep this brief, because many of my questions have already been answered.
Does meeting the 2030 targets require a radically different approach from the one that has been taken to meet the 2023-24 targets? Would the concepts of a minimum income guarantee or a universal basic income be feasible options, in terms of affordability and effectiveness, that the Government could explore to tackle poverty?
I put that question to Jack Evans first.