The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1207 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
I thank the witnesses for their evidence so far this morning.
Some of the earlier comments touched on the breathing space scheme. Do the witnesses have any further suggestions for reforms or improvements to the processes and procedures that could help people who are experiencing debt and mental health problems? That question goes first to Rebecca Stacey.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you, Rebecca. Time is moving on so, unless any other witnesses want to come in, I will pass back to the convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
I will follow on from some of those responses. In terms of debt with private creditors, could more responsibility be placed on creditors to flag a potential debt before it gets to crisis point? From looking at debt on, for example, credit cards, credit accounts and catalogues, we know that making minimum payments tends to be a real issue for people. No one who is making a minimum payment for accrued debt is doing that for any reason other than that they are in trouble; no one does that if they can pay the full amount. Creditors allow that to go on endlessly and it becomes a horrible vicious circle, with people not clearing any of the original debt.
On food poverty, people are now getting into debt paying for essential items. Creditors are popping up that enable people to buy shopping on a “buy now, pay later” basis, or to pay for shopping over three payments. I have constituents who are paying interest on food items that they bought nine to 12 months ago. That is shocking.
Are there ways in which we can deal with such situations before they become a problem? Rather than letting it get to the stage of a debt arrangement scheme being needed—a bankruptcy process would probably not be relevant—could we reduce debt by removing a portion of the interest accrued or, as I suggested, by getting the creditor to flag up the matter before it becomes an issue?
It seems that when we get rid of one problem organisation or one of those types of creditor, others pop up. Is there a way in which we could limit them? They tend to focus on and target people on low incomes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you. Does Paul White want to add anything?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
We have spoken this morning about the role of local authorities in the delivery of not only a net zero transport system but consistency across the board.
What role can regional transport partnerships play in the delivery of net zero? Do the witnesses feel that that role might differ based on the model of RTP, and could any problems arise from that, given different responsibilities, approaches or, perhaps, inconsistencies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Scottish Power’s parent company, Iberdrola, has announced that it forecasts a net profit for 2022 of somewhere between €4 billion and €4.2 billion. Taking those profits into consideration, how can Scottish Power justify increasing household utility bills by 54 per cent, in line with the increase in the energy cap? I put that to Keith Anderson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Thank you for your thorough response.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
Frazer Scott said at the beginning that it is not going to be a choice between heating or eating; it is just going to be a fact that people have no money. We all have real concerns about how that will impact people’s everyday lives.
We have people on prepayment meters; if you have no money, you have no money to put into a prepayment meter. I would like to see more advice coming from suppliers on the differences between debit meters and prepayment meters. Often, information from suppliers is extremely complex. Prepayment meters do not work for everyone and there can be real complications when people try to change from a prepayment meter to a debit meter; there can be credit checks. Would you like to see more from suppliers to assist people who will really struggle? We are expecting people to get into debt because of this; perhaps suppliers could be working with people and giving people a little bit more leeway over the coming months, which will be extremely hard.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Natalie Don-Innes
To follow up on your first point, do you feel that energy suppliers are genuinely trying to keep costs down and that, without continued increases in the price cap, private energy firms would struggle? Are those increases necessary, when energy firms are still achieving high profits?