The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1046 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Neil Gray
I thank Ms Anastasiadou, Ms Sweeney, Dr Sutherland and the minister for the extended time that they have given us this morning—it is very much appreciated. The session has been insightful and helpful, and I have no doubt that we will see, and welcome, you before the committee very soon. That concludes the public part of today’s meeting.
11:14 Meeting continued in private until 11:31.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Neil Gray
Thank you, Dr Sutherland.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
Beth Watts wants to come in on the back of that. I ask her to be brief, please.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
Thank you very much. I believe that Elena Whitham has a supplementary question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
I will bring in Marie McNair for the final theme of questioning.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
Good morning and welcome to the ninth meeting of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee. Apologies have been received from Natalie Don, and I am pleased to say that Evelyn Tweed is attending as her substitute.
The first item of business is a decision on whether to take items 5 and 6 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
Agenda item 3 is an evidence-taking session on homelessness and rough sleeping. Our plan is to hold some stand-alone evidence sessions on topics that are covered by the committee’s remit to establish priorities for future work in the current parliamentary session, and this is the first of those focused sessions.
Given that homelessness is also of interest to the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, we have invited members of that committee to join us today. In addition to Mr Briggs, who is a member of both committees, I have great pleasure in welcoming Elena Whitham, who is deputy convener of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. I hope that we can continue to carry out such joint committee scrutiny where there is a crossover of issues.
09:15I also welcome our panel of witnesses, who are joining us remotely: Maggie Brünjes, who is chief executive of the Homeless Network Scotland; Lorna Campbell, who is financial wellbeing and revenues manager at Dumfries and Galloway Council; Lorraine McGrath, who is chief executive of the Simon Community Scotland; Dr Beth Watts, who is a senior research fellow at Heriot-Watt University; and Gordon MacRae, who is assistant director of Shelter Scotland.
I have a few housekeeping points to highlight for colleagues in the room and those who are joining us remotely. I ask everyone to allow our broadcasting colleagues a few seconds to turn your microphones on before you start to speak. Witnesses, you can indicate with an R in the dialogue box in BlueJeans, or simply with a show of hands, if you wish to come in on a question; I will monitor that as best I can. You should not feel that you have to answer every single question—if you have nothing new to add to what others have said, that is okay.
I invite members to direct their questions to particular witnesses. We are fortunate today in that we have such a wide range of witnesses before us, but in the interests of time—we have about an hour and a half—I hope that we can direct our questions to individuals.
I now invite colleagues to ask questions. The first comes from Jeremy Balfour.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
I note from the minister’s correspondence that it is the Government’s intention to introduce legislation to bring about employment injury assistance. He suggests that your proposed legislation is therefore “unnecessary”. How would you respond to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
Before I bring in Pam Duncan-Glancy, I invite Lorna Campbell to reflect, from a local authority perspective, on the priority groups that were referred to in an earlier answer from Lorraine McGrath, and on the policies that you have put in place in your authority, in particular for prison leavers, for people in black, Asian and minority ethnic groups and for women and children fleeing domestic violence. Is there anything that you want to mention in relation to what you are doing to help those people?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Neil Gray
As we are talking about prevention, I will bring in Lorna Campbell to talk about the work that is being done in the local authority setting, particularly on financial resilience, and to touch on the points that Maggie Brünjes made about rent arrears and ensuring that people have financial resilience in order to avoid falling into homelessness. Lorna, will you touch on those areas from a local authority perspective, please?