The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1046 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
Lovely. Ed Pybus, Richard Gass and Judith Paterson, I appreciate your time. Your input has been invaluable as we go through the process of scrutinising the implementation of ADP. It is greatly appreciated. No doubt we will be back in touch again but, in the meantime, I wish you all a merry Christmas.
I suspend briefly to change over the panel of witnesses.
10:10 Meeting suspended.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
Welcome to the 14th meeting in 2021 of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee. Apologies have been received from Natalie Don, and I am pleased to say that Evelyn Tweed is attending as her substitute.
Our first item of business today is a decision on whether to take items 3, 4 and 5 in private. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I can see that Bill Scott concurs with that.
Craig Smith, Frank McKillop, Keith Park, Trisha Hatt and Bill Scott, I thank you all for your time. Yours was insightful evidence that is helpful to our work on ADP. I wish you all a very merry Christmas.
That concludes the public part of this morning’s meeting. Next week, the committee will take evidence on the budget. I invite members to join the private session via the link provided.
11:18 Meeting continued in private until 11:41.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
Is that addressed to any panel member in particular?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I will bring in Bill Scott followed by Craig Smith. I am conscious that we have not heard from Trisha Hatt yet. If Trisha has anything to add, I will be happy to bring her in after that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I am very conscious of time. We have about half an hour left and quite a few colleagues to get through, so I ask that we be quick with questions and answers. It would be helpful if the witnesses could come in when they have something new to add, rather than reiterating points that have already been made.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I have one final very brief question, which is predominantly to Keith Park. Do you believe that issues of eligibility, such as the 20m rule, will require reassessment on transfer? Could you give a reason for your thoughts on that, please?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
That is extremely helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
Are there any colleagues in the virtual room with any information or input on that question?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Neil Gray
I am conscious that we have representatives of two UK-wide organisations present. Keith Park and Trisha Hatt, do you have any view on whether the UK Government has any intention to review the 20m rule, which Marie McNair asked about? Clearly, that would answer some of the problems and concerns that have been raised about passporting and the move of people who are currently on DLA to ADP.