The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1046 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
Not at this stage, no.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
I note those comments on Mr McArthur’s endeavours. It is for the Parliament to decide on the bill at stage 1. We would then need to consider our position on the basis of what we have set out prior to the stage 1 debate, including what I set out in the memorandum. We would explore any opportunities should the bill pass stage 1.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
Again, that is for Mr McArthur to consider. We have not taken a policy position on that issue. The Government does not have a policy position on the elements in the bill, so we would need to consider and determine the issues on the basis of the evidence that is gathered by the committee, should the bill pass stage 1.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
In the memorandum that I sent to the committee, we queried the financial memorandum. I note that Mr McArthur has done some further work on the back of that. However, we have concerns that the costs that have been set out in the financial memorandum do not go as far as what we believe could end up being the cost. It may well be that the bill would require a financial memorandum to be associated with it.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
The figure that I gave you was for doctors.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
I have not had that concern expressed to me or suggested as a motivation behind someone supporting an assisted dying bill or otherwise. We will continue to make palliative care available as universally and equitably as we possibly can. I believe that, in the steps that we have taken in the proposed budget, we can see a continued improvement in that position with regard to the direct funding that we are seeking to provide to hospices, which, like many other social care providers, are facing a particular challenge with the likes of the increase in employer national insurance contributions that is coming down the track. We are looking to support those organisations as best we can, while obviously wanting to see the UK Government resolve that matter at source.
As for the funding that we provide to our health and social care partnerships and our health boards, it is for them to direct where that goes, based on the demand being placed on them—in this case, with regard to palliative care services. We will continue to work with them to ensure that such care can be provided as universally and equitably as possible.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
Ms Harper is correct.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
We have extensive policy positioning on this area. The consultation on our draft palliative care strategy has just concluded. We are considering the responses and expect to be able to publish the strategy later this year.
As Mr Whittle will have seen in the draft budget, we have put extensive additional funding—£21.7 billion—into health and social care services in general, and we expect local boards to ensure that adequate palliative care provision is available. We have also included a line for increased hospice care funding and a proposal to align pay and conditions in the hospice sector with the national health service agenda for change conditions, so that we can ensure that adequate palliative care is in place.
I am very grateful to the people in the NHS, the hospice sector, community and social care, and general practice who provide extensive palliative care support, whether in a hospital, someone’s home, a care home or a hospice. The tireless efforts that they make to do so receive my extensive thanks. We, in the Parliament, have a role to play to help people to understand what palliative care is and is not and what interaction it has with the bill in order to ensure that stigma around palliative care and dying is addressed. With that in mind, we will look to ensure that we are doing everything that is possible to provide the palliative care support that people need and expect.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
Yes. Should the bill pass stage 1, extensive discussions would need to be had with a number of stakeholders, and I would have a responsibility as health secretary to ensure that I was taking matters forward in the interests of health and social care services and the people who interact with them. I think that everyone would expect me to have conversations such as those that Mr Gulhane set out.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Neil Gray
Again, I understand that being a query and an area of interrogation for the committee, but the Government has not taken a position on that as yet.