The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1337 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I want to move on to advocacy services. When we met care-experienced children yesterday, they highlighted for me and the group that I was in the importance of independent advocacy. It touches on section 4 of the bill, “Advocacy services for care-experienced persons”, and concerns have been expressed about how the bill relies too much on secondary legislation.
I will turn to Jim Savege on this. Some concerns were expressed by, for example, Adoption UK, South Ayrshire Council, COSLA and so on, about the detail of advocacy provision being left to subsequent regulations. SOLACE’s submission mentions that the bill lacks clarity on who qualifies for advocacy, how it will be delivered and how it will be funded. Do you want to say a little bit more about that and about the need for independent advocacy? That issue came through very clearly last night from the care-experienced children.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Yes, input from young people. How do councils intend to get that input and evaluate the advocacy? It is key that kids are involved not just in designing the plan but in evaluating it regularly, to make sure that it actually works. That is fundamental. How does it actually work on the ground? Rather than its being delivered to kids, they should know that they are part of the process. That message came through very strongly yesterday.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Do you have anything to add, Mr Berry?
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I will touch a little more on care experience. Sections 5 and 6 of the bill refer to guidance for public authorities and organisations in relation to care experience. Some responses to the call for views were supportive of the proposals for guidance, but there were concerns that the bill does not include a universal definition, which would instead be left to secondary legislation.
Does anyone have a point to make about that? I will come to you first, Mr Berry. Do you want to come in on the definition of care experience before I open up the question to everyone else?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
That was the view that we heard from the children last night.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Does the bill rely too much on secondary legislation or is it about flexibility? Perhaps it depends very much on the case. What is your view?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Fiona Whitelock, I will come to you on that one, because the other key point the kids made yesterday was about their input into advocacy. In previous evidence, Who Cares? Scotland, spoke about the importance of independent advocacy. One key issue is how we evaluate that advocacy and another is how we ensure that there is input from those who use advocacy services. What are your thoughts on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I do not think that there is an easy answer.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Some of the feedback concerned the importance of achieving a balance between flexibility and clarity. That might touch on Jim Savege’s point about each area being different—he mentioned Banchory and Peterhead, in Aberdeenshire. Is it better to have flexibility at the cost of clarity? Is it bad to have more flexibility in the process?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Do you have anything to add, Jim?