The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1461 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Paul McLennan
:What is the best way to tackle that situation? Is it through schools and through early education for women? Is it through organisations such as Deaf Action? What is the best way of ensuring that that sort of thing does not happen in the future?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Paul McLennan
A lack of understanding of rights and consent is a risk factor for deaf women, and Lucy Clark has touched on the need for early education and awareness raising, both of which I think are really important. Adults need to have that knowledge and understanding of deaf women and children. Can you say a little bit more about what I think is a really important point that you have raised?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Paul McLennan
:Professor Napier, do you want to come in on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Paul McLennan
:A bit more about early education and awareness raising, particularly on the consent issue, because I think that that is really important.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Paul McLennan
:That will be a key area for our successor committee to pick up on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Paul McLennan
:Mr Naylor, perhaps you can say something about what the role of the inspectorate looks like as we move forward. I am having a look through the minutes of the first meeting of the data short-life working group. There are about 15 organisations listed, but it is not just about who was at that meeting; the role of local authorities is incredibly important as well.
We will identify the extent of the problem, but how do we ensure that we are always on top of it as we move forward? Has the inspectorate had a look at what its role will be in that regard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Paul McLennan
:I know that it is still early days, as the group has only met once. I will open that question up to the other witnesses, because, as you said, Professor Jay, data collection is really important. How can we tackle a problem if we do not know the extent of it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Paul McLennan
To build on some of the points that Mr Kidd made, I will ask about data. I remember that you spoke about the matter before Christmas, Professor Jay. I think that you said at that time that, although data collection is happening, we do not consider it to be reliable in Scotland or, as it happens, in England and Wales. We know that the short-life working group met in January, and I would like to get an update from you on that, although I know that it is still early days for you to be able to see where that group is going.
The key question is how we share the information that comes from that data. What would the approach be? I will ask you that question first, Professor Jay, because I think that you identified the matter as being key, and you have touched on it already this morning.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Paul McLennan
:The shared care work that you mentioned will be fundamental and I look forward to receiving an update on that.
I will move on to a slightly different question. You mentioned the Royal College of Psychiatrists. I have met with the college and the committee had an evidence session with representatives from the RCP, who talked about national guidelines for working conditions and reasonable adjustments for schools, higher education institutions and employers. What are your thoughts on that? They pushed the idea of a cross-sectoral approach.
Another key question comes from the evidence that we heard last week about neurodivergence training for teachers, which can vary within individual schools, never mind within local authorities. That issue was picked up by one group that we heard from last week. A lot depends on whether teachers have had training. How can we increase the level of training on and recognition of neurodivergence and how can schools look at the issue of reasonable adjustments?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Paul McLennan
:Thank you.