Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thank you.

I have a supplementary on that, as I would like to get a bit more detail. We do not want to find, when we get to the next audit, that there are still issues with a data gap. What work will be done on that between now and the next audit? We know from what the Scottish Fiscal Commission said that it has had an issue with that, and we do not want it to be raised again at the next audit. How will you continue to monitor progress, especially on the data gap? The data informs the budget, and it is a particularly difficult time to track demand.

Are there any comments on whether that indicative budget is enough?

I have two questions, one of which is general and one of which is kind of specific. I will start with the specific one. In the light of what remains to be done in the programme, do you have any comments on the social security administration indicative budget that is set out in the spending review?

On the more general point, what are the key risks in developing the remaining aspects of the programme?

The focus has been on systems that matter most to the client. What is the state of functionality in systems that have not been prioritised?

Following on from that, about a month ago, the Scottish Fiscal Commission spoke to us about data gaps. Do you share the concerns about that? Do you think that the systems have been designed in a way that takes account of various elements? The key thing that came out of our meeting with the Fiscal Commission was the need to produce data from the budget. How accurate was that data?

What difference would additional borrowing make to you in terms of this particular budget? As I said, many services are led by demand. I am aware that devolved Governments outwith the UK have such borrowing powers. What difference would additional borrowing powers make to you in dealing with issues that we have talked about?

So, the full amount is £2.4 billion.

Deputy First Minister, at the start you mentioned the fiscal limitations. I know that I have asked you this question before, but this is for the sake of the committee. On the discussions that you are having with the UK Government about the fiscal framework, you mentioned the budget being inflation proofed. What discussions have you had about that? You mentioned that the budget is worth £1.7 billion less.

Many social security services are demand led. What difference would additional borrowing powers make—in particular, with regard to the social security budget, rather than to others?

Gordon MacRae, I will touch on what you said about changing the approach to affordable housing and building more social housing. What level of discussions have you had with COSLA on its view on that? It is a key partner, along with individual local authorities. There might be capacity issues with how it develops that scheme.

The programme for government announced an increase to discretionary housing payments and an extension of the eligibility for the tenant grant fund. What impact will that have on tenants? Could any other measures be taken to address the cost of living for tenants?

You mentioned that the impact of inflation on the budget was worth £1.7 billion. The public sector pay increase that you mentioned is £700 million because of the impact of inflation. Are you talking about the £1.7 billion plus the £700 million?