The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1482 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I suspect that we could talk about this for quite a long time, as it is a massive topic. However, one area that you have not given me quite enough information on yet is how you support industry to understand the juggernaut that is coming down the track.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. Thank you very much for attending. I have found the discussion very interesting.
One area that we have not touched on is the unknown unknowns for employers. Looking at artificial intelligence and its impact on a whole range of sectors—virtually everything—we have seen clear evidence of unknown unknowns with the green transition, which we have touched on a wee bit. I would like your reflections on how you are taking account of unknown unknowns, using AI as an example. How on earth do you help support people in industry when they also do not know what they do not know—in other words, when they do not know what they need?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Do you mean how they do business?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
That brings us to the end of the evidence session. I thank the witnesses very much for their evidence.
12:13 Meeting continued in private until 12:34.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. Thanks for joining us. My question arguably follows on from Daniel Johnson’s question.
Recommendation 1 in your report is that there should be a new culture of leadership. We have talked about leadership, but I want to probe a bit more about culture and what you have seen since you produced your report, in 2023. I assume that you meant much more than not focusing only on university degrees as being the appropriate route and much more than that it was a fragmented landscape. Given your summary that
“Culture does not shift easily”,
what changes have you seen in the culture thus far?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Classic. Absolutely. Thank you very much for that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
It is a supplementary on the Deputy First Minister’s opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will leave it there. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a quick follow-on question, and I want to hear from Dr Malik as well.
One good bit about Scotland is that everybody knows everybody and, sometimes, one of the downsides is that everybody knows everybody. In a business context, how can we avoid groupthink and always keep the perspective fresh, particularly on the significant drivers of change?
A witness at one of our sessions, Tony Rodgers from Emtelle UK Ltd, had what I think all members felt was an entirely refreshing approach. It felt to us that Government will often go to the same old same old, not because they are not good—I am not dismissing anybody—but because that is easier. It is quite hard work to find the voices with a fresh perspective. Often those voices are from businesses that are taking risk and that are quite small—they could be spinouts from a university.
Given that we need to be at the head of the queue with some of the drivers, what are your plans within this cultural shift to embed that fresh perspective in Government? After you have answered, Deputy First Minister, I will bring in Dr Malik.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will finish off with a question for Dr Malik. What do you see as your role going forward? It may not be you personally, but what you have been able to bring has been generally recognised and very much valued. How will that work continue so that we have freshness of perspective and a sound voice, and so that we keep focusing on the shift in culture?