The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1499 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
I am aware of time, convener, but perhaps James Black can just finish off with any comments on risk and uncertainty in general.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
I knew that you would.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
James Black and Ben Thurman, what are your reflections on how the culture within a programme or policy development affects outcomes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thanks for attending the meeting.
Following on from the area of challenge that James Black highlighted, I am interested in reflections on culture. The Audit Scotland submission referenced issues around the early learning and childcare policy. It set out that there was not a proper options analysis of the potential impact against cost, no evidence of improved outcomes, and so on. That is the what, but I want to explore why and to what extent those particular issues were related to that programme or divisional culture and, in general terms, how culture affects decision making. I will start off with Mark Taylor.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
You have quite naturally led me on to the next area that I wanted to explore. I noted that your submission says:
“Despite the rhetoric on wellbeing, there is work to be done to put the National Outcomes at the centre of decision making.”
In your experience, how are risk and uncertainty managed? I wonder whether the cross-cutting nature of the national performance framework makes the outcomes less certain. Where there is greater risk, that can often be an inhibitor. It is easier to make decisions about a tiny wee bit of something than it is to do so across the piece. How do risk and uncertainty impede effective decision making?
My question is for everyone, but Ben Thurman can go first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
Does Mark Taylor want to come in on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
Before I bring in James Black, I have a quick question for you. How much evidence do you see of proper risk management in terms of disaggregation and risk probability outcomes and so on, from an academic perspective? Do you see that being done routinely? I have come across examples when speaking to ministers where there does not appear to be any awareness of how to disaggregate risk. I do not know whether that is something that you have seen.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
I will ask just one more question, because a lot of information has been brought out and I know that my colleagues will want to pick up on it.
The focus of our inquiry is a just transmission for Grangemouth, and we have talked about some of the significant structural issues. To add to that, I ask each of you to give a view on how we can overcome another structural issue around financing, which concerns the role of women-led businesses, and incorporate up front the measures that Heather Buchanan outlined. The just transition is a massive area. To what extent are your representative organisations aware of the importance of women and women-led businesses being at the heart of it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Michelle Thomson
I declare an interest as an ambassador for the all-party parliamentary group on fair business banking, with which I think Heather Buchanan now has a peripheral involvement.
Heather, you used a term that intrigued me when you talked about devising a glide path rather than a cliff edge. To me, that speaks to the current mismatch between the demand side and the supply side. I am interested in understanding the golden threads and the building blocks that are needed to be able to cut through. I know that Bankers for Net Zero has sent out a paper about something called Perseus, and you mentioned methodologies up front that are presumably meant and devised to be scalable. Equally, I think that NatWest and the ABI will be looking for those things, because they are the enabling structures.
Will you give us a little more flavour of what should ideally be in place to ensure that we have a glide path and not a cliff edge? Following on from that, what roles can the UK Government and particularly the Scottish Government play?