The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1690 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Do you think, therefore, that we could come at the issue from the other end? Could we look at the financial mechanisms over which the Scottish Government can exert some control and see how those could be used effectively to assist community wealth building? Do you have a sense of whether we could flip the approach on its head in that way?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
My point is that Ineos, as a landlord, could put punitive terms in place. If it was not all that keen on something that it viewed as having the potential to represent competition that it was not looking for, it could do anything that it wanted. Ineos could look at the issue from a commercial perspective, and it would have the power to act in that way. Given that power imbalance, does the Government recognise that there are not only opportunities but risks?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Exactly.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, panel members, and thank you for joining us. There is a wider perspective on the bill than that which relates to procurement. I have a general question about how you see things changing in a range of areas that would help to direct moneys positively to enable some of the community wealth building activities that are under way. How will the bill help to firm that up?
A range of mechanisms could be used, some of which are probably already being used. I am thinking of community asset transfer, compulsory purchase orders, local sector pension funds or the entirely different route that is provided by SNIB. I accept what you said earlier in response to Daniel Johnson, but will anything change as a result of the bill that will get money into projects? Jackie Taylor, you mentioned the commercial aspects, so perhaps you or Jane Martin could offer some thoughts on that.
11:30Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Would you expect there to be more mention of that in the bill? What the bill intends is great—I do not think that anybody is particularly objecting to it—but I am not hearing much dialogue about how you actually make it happen. We will probably start to derive a much clearer set of benefits by focusing on the how, and I feel as though there is a slight disconnect in that respect.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am not saying that Ineos would do that; I am only making the point that it could do so, because it has the power. There is more than one way to skin a cat and more than one way to stop a project. I am not claiming that it will do that or even that I see such an intention; I only recognise, for the sake of risk assessment, that it retains considerable power and could make the situation difficult.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
We know that we have an issue around retaining the skills cluster. Given the nature of the funding, which includes £25 million from the Scottish Government, that could perhaps be disaggregated in order to get some shorter-term projects in place—to get some runs on the board now, if you like. The £200 million from the UK Government, via the National Wealth Fund, will involve a much longer and more complex process, including due diligence.
How are you breaking down the nature of projects between short-term ones that might be about job retention just now—but with the ability to go to scale in the future—and longer-term projects? Are you actively considering that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Perhaps Chris Bryceland can pick this up. We have discussed changing regulations in order to enable SAF, which other people might want to come in on. My point is that, as an attractor, a clear Scottish speciality chemical strategy is needed. I am not yet sufficiently clear about the specific Scottish strategy for speciality chemicals, compared with some of the wider stuff that is going on. If we get the approach right, the specialist chemicals, in and of themselves, will have significant potential to provide added value for all of Scotland.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Do either of our two guests who are online want to come in on that point? Emilia Crighton, I see that your hand is up.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Throughout this mini-inquiry, our focus has been on the refinery, and now we are looking forward.
Jan Robertson, there is obviously a great deal of work going on at Scottish Enterprise. Certainly, I have had a large number of approaches, meetings and discussions on the matter, which I have referred on to Scottish Enterprise to triage. It would be useful if you could share what you can about the type and nature of the projects that are coming through. After that, I will have further questions. I appreciate equally well that there will be commercial sensitivities, but it would be useful to put on the record what you are able to say at this point.