The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I think that Paul Sheerin wants to make a final comment before I hand back to the convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
It is a super answer, because my next question was going to be on your insights into how we deal with some of the major themes, such as AI and getting to net zero. There is also the question about the exponential growth that will be triggered by issues around AI and net zero and the linkages therein that are quite complex.
Given that you have introduced that topic, I will invite Paul Campbell and Paul Sheerin to reflect on that—I will give Jack Norquoy a chance to come back in, as well. First of all, however, I ask our witnesses to respond to the first question, about engagement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you very much for joining us. I want to ask a couple of open, framing questions.
As you know, the committee is looking at wider skills policy, which is different from the work that is being undertaken by the Education, Children and Young People Committee. I want to get a sense from you of how businesses engage with Scotland’s skills system and the extent to which you feel that the views of industry or your sector are fairly represented and heard in order to shape policy and the provisioning of skills.
I will go first to the first person who looks up—Jack Norquoy, well done—but I would like to hear from all the witnesses.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will put the same question to the rest of the panel. I think that Sandy Begbie was the next one who looked up.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have mentioned providers such as colleges, but do you feel that there is a clear way for your trade body to be able to influence and shape policies such as the new deal for business? Are you clear about how you can take part in the shaping of those policies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much.
Jack Norquoy, I said that I would give you a chance to come back in, because we moved on to talking about AI. Obviously, net zero is your bag, but do you want to add any final reflections?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
To pick up on that, for the record, can you give us an example today—it is always useful to furnish an example—that we can reflect in our deliberations?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have skilfully taken the opportunity to put on the record some of the areas that Scottish Renewables is interested in, and quite rightly so, but I still want to understand the extent to which you feel that the views of industry are heard with regard to the shaping of policy and provision.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
As is the nature of these things, many of the questions that I was going to ask have been covered, so I will just pick up on a couple of points.
Let us go back to the question about how effective current political engagement is. I know that there has been a discussion about that already, but I would like to gently challenge you on why you chose to refer to the Scottish Human Rights Commission’s contribution instead of giving your own view as the Auditor General. Does that mean that you do not have a view, or is it that you just could not think of anything?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
A lot of this has been covered, but—I do not want to put words in your mouth—you view the national performance framework as the most accessible way in which ordinary members of the public can grasp the thematics of this and what that means for them. Is that correct?