The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1495 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
How did I know that that comment was going to come up? Thank you, convener. [Laughter.]
I want to ask about a couple of interrelated areas. The previous panel expressed some concern about offset—or set-off, as I think you describe it—and called it heavy handed. The point that I made to them was that a principled approach is surely being established in anticipation of further taxes being devolved in order to ensure that, where people owe tax, we are able to claw it back. Am I correct in that assumption?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
Maybe it does. I am not trying to get to any slam dunk; I am genuinely trying to understand. You have given me more helpful insight, although I suspect that I have further to go to bottom out some of this stuff. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
That is helpful. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
I have just one small question, which arguably follows on from those of the convener and Michael Marra. Mr Doak, in your submission, you noted that
“Significant behaviour change is unlikely unless the Scottish Government decides to change the rate drastically, and even then there isn’t an obvious supply of alternative materials available.”
I know that Mr Marra has been touching on this, but I am still not sure that I have a clear sense of it. Mr Marra made a good point about red chips and aggregate that is specific to Scotland, but I am still not clear on the detail of different aggregate types and what overall potential price increases they could stand, although, as everyone has said, there are no plans for that on the table.
I wonder whether you could help me understand a bit more. As you point out correctly, English producers might be keen to exploit any substantial rate increases in Scotland; we all understand that. However the devil surely must be in the detail. I know that we have danced around the issue a bit with two separate questions, but if you could help me understand a bit more, that would be helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
You are talking about secondary aggregates. That is what I was misunderstanding.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. I will follow up on a point that Liz Smith made. I have raised with the Deputy First Minister a question about inefficiency related to the annual budget process and significant in-year changes. It seems to me that that must incur a significant amount of sunk costs in redoing and repositioning things, and so on. Am I right in having that perception, and is it also your perception?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
You have set out what I thought, and very clearly. I suppose the point that I am making is that there is a cost to the inefficiency. If you were working in a law firm, you would itemise every hour to say what goes to this client and what goes to that client. Have you ever considered collecting the cost of inefficiency as fiscal events occur, and of late notification? A number being put on that inefficiency could very well be quite compelling.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
I will watch that with interest.
My last point comes back to a question that I previously asked you about police pensions and the extent to which the increase in them—and, therefore, provision for them—came about a result of Covid-19. I thank you for your reply, in which I think you pointed out—and I am paraphrasing here—that that was not due to Covid-19 but was the result of the move from a final salary to a career average pension scheme. The legal challenge in that respect will also apply to other public sector professionals such as teachers, because they face the same issue, but the fact is that we have seen a difference with regard to the rate at which police officers are retiring. As a result, the change to the provision—compared with that of, say, teachers—was not necessarily entirely due to the change to the police’s pension arrangements, given that it did not equally apply to teachers. Do you have any reflections on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Michelle Thomson
You are correctly introducing another complexity for the bill, but that is good because that is what we want to tease out. Have we got the data to draw on to arrive at some of these decisions? I am not sure what data your members will routinely gather and submit as part of the existing processes that tease out all the different areas that the Scottish Government will have.