The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1482 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will come on to that. Can I assume, then, that one of the groups that you have referenced is the women’s development network?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I suspect that we will probably go on to that. A freedom of information response that was released on 31 January 2025 notes that
“the Women’s Development Network aims to create a supportive platform and level-playing field for women (and those who identify as women)”—
that is, self-identification. Is the Scottish civil service allowing self-identification in other areas, despite that not being legal?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a couple of quick questions.
Earlier, we mentioned the trans inclusion policy. I want to note that the equality impact assessment on that seemed to be heavily skewed towards LGBTI groups. The EqIA states that four other protected characteristics—disability, age, sex, and religion or belief—are relevant to it, but none of those groups were represented in the process of developing that EqIA. Six out of 10 places in the steering group, other than the lead official, were set aside for staff who represented LGBTI interests. Is that weighting representative of how you normally try to meet the public sector equality duty?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
You made a comment that I was going to make about specialism in media journalism. We have lost the likes of Ian Fraser, and we very much have generalists. Your common or garden MSP might not understand the fiscal framework, but that extends to journalists. We all have roles; it is not just for the Scottish Fiscal Commission. It is probably also for the political parties, because it is not in the public interest that there is such a swathe of ignorance.
I do not have anything else to add, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Then why would they exclude representation of those other four protected characteristics?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
They should be not just lockable, but stand-alone.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I know that you will, convener. I meant the permanent secretary.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
The committee has raised the issue that we are committed to a number of benefits in Scotland that are demand led, and that the draw on those benefits is increasing, against the backdrop of a fixed budget. That is why we are using the terminology around fiscal sustainability. The bill would be exactly the same, because the right would be enshrined in law and, the next thing we know, we would potentially have the Scottish Fiscal Commission saying, “Well, as a result of the bill’s success and more people coming forward, we have a very steep curve that, alongside the one for social security benefits, greatly affects our fiscal sustainability.”
I think that the convener, in his opening questions, said that we cannot predict the timescales for when the £4 of savings for every £1 will kick in. Therefore, we could be setting ourselves on course for massive cuts in other areas, because we cannot break the law and we have a fixed budget. That is the point that I want to bring out.
I have one other question. Having looked at the 95 points in the financial memorandum, which I have to say are very good, I was quite surprised by the relatively narrow bandwidth between the low and high year 1 costs. I would have expected that to be considerably higher. What was the thinking behind that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
But my question was: are you aware of any other country that has enshrined this in legislation instead of taking a principled approach? I am not aware of any, but you are obviously across the issue. Has any other country enshrined this in legislation in the manner in which you are proposing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.