Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1482 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

I will come on to that. Can I assume, then, that one of the groups that you have referenced is the women’s development network?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

I suspect that we will probably go on to that. A freedom of information response that was released on 31 January 2025 notes that

“the Women’s Development Network aims to create a supportive platform and level-playing field for women (and those who identify as women)”—

that is, self-identification. Is the Scottish civil service allowing self-identification in other areas, despite that not being legal?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

I have a couple of quick questions.

Earlier, we mentioned the trans inclusion policy. I want to note that the equality impact assessment on that seemed to be heavily skewed towards LGBTI groups. The EqIA states that four other protected characteristics—disability, age, sex, and religion or belief—are relevant to it, but none of those groups were represented in the process of developing that EqIA. Six out of 10 places in the steering group, other than the lead official, were set aside for staff who represented LGBTI interests. Is that weighting representative of how you normally try to meet the public sector equality duty?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

“OECD Review of the Scottish Fiscal Commission 2025”

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

You made a comment that I was going to make about specialism in media journalism. We have lost the likes of Ian Fraser, and we very much have generalists. Your common or garden MSP might not understand the fiscal framework, but that extends to journalists. We all have roles; it is not just for the Scottish Fiscal Commission. It is probably also for the political parties, because it is not in the public interest that there is such a swathe of ignorance.

I do not have anything else to add, convener.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

Then why would they exclude representation of those other four protected characteristics?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

They should be not just lockable, but stand-alone.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 18 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

I know that you will, convener. I meant the permanent secretary.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

The committee has raised the issue that we are committed to a number of benefits in Scotland that are demand led, and that the draw on those benefits is increasing, against the backdrop of a fixed budget. That is why we are using the terminology around fiscal sustainability. The bill would be exactly the same, because the right would be enshrined in law and, the next thing we know, we would potentially have the Scottish Fiscal Commission saying, “Well, as a result of the bill’s success and more people coming forward, we have a very steep curve that, alongside the one for social security benefits, greatly affects our fiscal sustainability.”

I think that the convener, in his opening questions, said that we cannot predict the timescales for when the £4 of savings for every £1 will kick in. Therefore, we could be setting ourselves on course for massive cuts in other areas, because we cannot break the law and we have a fixed budget. That is the point that I want to bring out.

I have one other question. Having looked at the 95 points in the financial memorandum, which I have to say are very good, I was quite surprised by the relatively narrow bandwidth between the low and high year 1 costs. I would have expected that to be considerably higher. What was the thinking behind that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

But my question was: are you aware of any other country that has enshrined this in legislation instead of taking a principled approach? I am not aware of any, but you are obviously across the issue. Has any other country enshrined this in legislation in the manner in which you are proposing?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Michelle Thomson

Thank you.