Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1495 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

I have a few random questions. I noticed that there is now uncertainty around the growth deal for Argyll and Bute. Have you had a chance to explore whether there is uncertainty around any other growth deals? I am thinking in particular, and perhaps selfishly, about the Falkirk growth deal—or rather, the promise of funds that have not yet been finally agreed. Are there any concerns about any of the other growth deals?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Proposed National Outcomes

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

Good morning, cabinet secretary. First, I have a quick observation, rather than a question. In the consultation, the concerns that were raised were not about doing more things; it was the way in which the exercise was carried out as a research piece that brought criticism and led to the belief that it was a tick-box exercise.

Moving on, I want to pick up the convener’s comment about the references to “economic growth” being omitted. I have heard your responses to that, cabinet secretary, but I would just add an additional concern. It is my perception that, over the past few years, there has been a lack of clear long-term thinking. We have called this year’s budget scrutiny “A Strategic Approach”, and issues that we hear about often include the lack of multiyear funding and growing the tax base to fund things. Those are long-term endeavours that require a resilient economy. Therefore, when it comes to dropping the term

“sustainable and inclusive economic growth”,

I think that we need to focus for a minute on the “sustainable” part of that.

I would appreciate some comments about that, having heard what the cabinet secretary has said about not having economic growth for its own sake.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

And efficient—

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

My last wee question is whether there is any update on the status of air passenger duty. There has been quite a lot of talk in recent weeks about private jets and so on.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Proposed National Outcomes

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

You have made that last point very clearly and, indeed, have made it previously.

Just to finish off this conversation, I have a point about the term “inclusive”. I notice that the equality impact assessment called for consideration of a more gendered national performance framework. The official line from the Scottish Government is that it proposes to mainstream gender more effectively, but it is not yet

“possible to take an intersectional approach”.

I would like your comments on that because, for me, that feeds into some of my concerns with regard to the term “inclusive economic growth”. After all, we know that there is a continuing issue over whether women are getting a top seat at every level of the economic table. I would therefore like to hear your reflections on the EIA and where we are with addressing some of these issues.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

Thank you for your final point—I hear you strongly.

I have a final wee question, and I will let Helen Martin come in as well. To what extent is all the data that is collected routinely disaggregated by sex? Although I fully accept your final comment, do you and all the agencies see that data? Perhaps you could answer that and then Helen Martin can add any final considerations.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

I know that Helen might want to come in, but I will follow up on the discontinued survey that you mentioned. How much appetite for that data do you anticipate from other agencies—including the UK Government—that are responsible for undertaking services and collecting data? I am talking about some of the data that you highlight is necessary for us to measure whether we are on target to be a fair work nation and exploring the appetite for that data from the UK Government and other agencies, such as the ONS, which you mentioned.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

Good morning. Thank you for attending. Underpinning a lot of the discussion thus far is the data and what it means.

The Scottish Government has stated that the research that you commissioned helped to inform its “Fair Work Action Plan: the Scottish Government’s Evidence Plan on Fair Work”. To what extent does that evidence plan provide an effective framework for measuring whether Scotland is on track to be a fair work nation? If it does that, how does it do so in terms of data items and measures? If it does not, where are the gaps?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Michelle Thomson

Thank you.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Just Transition

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Michelle Thomson

I imagine that the scale of that fiscal risk is such that the Government is unlikely to take it, given the lack of long-term projections over funding.

At the start of the meeting, the convener made a throwaway comment when she alluded to, I think, a relatively modest further commitment to Grangemouth in the light of the recent announcement. There are two sets of £10 million on the table, because the £80 million is for the Falkirk growth deal—for the wider district. What are your thoughts about that £20 million fiscal contribution from both Governments, in the light of the predicted possible closure of the refinery? Is that enough money?