The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1482 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you for the report—I enjoyed it immensely.
I am genuinely pleased that the SFC got such a clean bill of health. During my time here, I have seen the very determined and deliberate attempts that it has made, particularly around increasing communication, so I celebrate it for that.
In some respects, it is almost like the SFC got the rap for our status quo, much of which we have touched on. I note that it is hard to teach somebody something when their job depends on their not understanding it. We see basic examples of that every year, with MSPs who do not understand why there is a need for contingency in a fixed budget. To what extent is your report a function of the fiscal framework in that there is a fixed budget and limited resource borrowing powers, and there is complexity in the fiscal framework? Would you concede a bit of sympathy for the SFC’s being in the firing line and agree that other actors have very clear roles to play?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
It would be useful to understand the relative weighting in the development of a multitude of EqIAs and how you assess that all protected characteristics are recognised.
I have a final question on a completely different area—before the convener interrupts me. There was quite a spat between you and the Scottish Information Commissioner over FOI 193/2024, which was to do with James Hamilton’s report. I want to assure myself about whether there were any other lingering issues that might come back to bite Joe Griffin in the future. In the light of all the outstanding freedom of information requests, if the Scottish Information Commissioner were here, would he describe himself as content with the status of all the FOIs before you move on from the Scottish Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
I just wanted to check, before you move on and Joe Griffin comes in, for his sake, that there are no stink bombs awaiting him in the form of outstanding actions from the Scottish Information Commissioner.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is useful to know.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have not quite answered my question. Are you 100 per cent sure that you are operating within the 1992 regulations and that the Scottish Government will not be another public body that will potentially be subject to a costly legal case? It would appear that many bodies remembered about the 2010 act but forgot about the 1992 regulations.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. Picking up on Liz Smith’s question, it is helpful to hear you articulate that you have ultimate accountability for head count in the civil service. It might be an idea if that were cascaded more thoroughly through the estate. I recall having a debate in Parliament not long ago, in which other parties—including Liz’s party—were condemning the Scottish Government for head count. However, given that you have ultimate accountability in reality, that seems unfair. It might be worth cascading that knowledge throughout all the civil service and, indeed, all the political parties.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Dialogue is fantastic, but the committee will look at ultimate accountability. It sounds like that area is worthy of a future look to understand the implications of that for democratically elected ministers and in-post civil servants.
I want to move on. I have a few further questions, so please bear with me if I interrupt you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good. Thank you. What percentage, roughly, of the overall head count of the civil service are women? It will help me with my figures.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. As we know, women have specific considerations, whether it is pregnancy, maternity leave or menopause and so on. In the civil service, what groups are in place to represent women’s voices in particular?