The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1495 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Michelle Thomson
I have looked at the impact assessments, and a third of them state that there will be no impact. Women are mentioned just twice—I fully accept what you said about the UK budget revision—but we know that cuts generally affect women disproportionately. I am just commenting that I was somewhat surprised, because it looked to me that the assessments had been done not only late but quite quickly. Any further information on that would be helpful.
I want to pick up on a comment that the convener made regarding the process that I referred to, when we were chatting earlier, as “internal shoogling”—moving money from budget pot to budget pot. I entirely understand the need for some of that, because new information will be coming in. Given the extent to which that happens—fairly regularly now—how does that fit with the drive for fiscal sustainability? The amount and the extent of that clearly indicates that a lot needs to be done. I understand some of the reasons for it, and what the drivers are, but it does not exactly scream of fiscal sustainability, considering the extent of the process.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
That makes the position clear.
I note for people who are watching that statutory fees were last updated in 2021, and there is no annual inflationary uplift, so do you anticipate the need for further statutory fee increases in the near future? Overall, inflation has largely stabilised, but inflation relating to staff costs has not, particularly in areas in which there might be shortages, such as digital. Is there a need for a further uplift in statutory fees in the near future?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and welcome to the 27th meeting in 2024 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. We have received apologies from our convener, Claire Baker, who is absent due to other parliamentary business. As the deputy convener, I will convene the meeting in her place.
The first item of business is a declaration of interests by Jamie Halcro Johnston, who is a newly reappointed member of the committee. He replaces Brian Whittle, and I put on record the committee’s thanks to Brian for his contribution. I welcome back Jamie Halcro Johnston and invite him to declare any relevant interests.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
Thank you for noting that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
I have a final question on that before I bring in Lorna Slater. What is framing your strategic approach to AI? Who are you bringing in to help you to determine that strategic approach? It sounds to me as if, at the moment, you are trying some things in a fairly small, limited manner. As Willie Coffey pointed out, the spend is relatively low, but how are you managing the risk that AI will, almost, be done to you rather than your using it proactively? Can you tell me a little more about your strategic thinking?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
My last question is about Scottish Government support. Your year 3 delivery plan states that you require
“nil resource budget and minimal amounts of capital and ring-fenced budgets to deliver our strategic objectives.”
Following on from my earlier points, I note that, if your income projections are at the lower end of the scale, you will not be able to recover your costs. Given that your income projections have already reduced, how confident are you that you will be able to recover your costs in the forthcoming years? I am trying to probe a bit about how you balance the cost to income ratio and how it affects you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
Indeed. Kevin Stewart has a quick question before I ask my last few questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
You regularly update your income and expenditure projections. Your central forecasts previously showed your income and costs steadily rising—not surprisingly—but they now show your income falling back after 2026-27. Can you give us a bit of a flavour of what is behind those projections? I suspect that we already know, but I would like you to put something on the record.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much. I will open with a question on the subject that you opened with, which is the wider financial climate. You sounded quite optimistic, but the considerable macroeconomic uncertainty and the tumultuous times that we have been going through must have had an impact on your ability to plan your finances and keep focused on your strategic objectives. Do you have sufficient flexibility to manage a variety of incoming risks as a result of the financial climate?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Michelle Thomson
Our next item of business is a decision on whether to take in private item 4, which is consideration of today’s evidence, and whether to consider in private at next week’s meeting an approach paper on the legislative consent memorandum for the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill. Are members content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.