The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1495 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Susan Aitken, given the dispersity of the geography of your area, do you agree with that statement that the deals have brought a sharpness of focus?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
I was going to ask about the fiscal framework, in which the IFS had quite a key role. You raised some concerns at the time around limits, noting that,
“rather than link the limits to inflation, it would make more sense to link them to the amount of revenue and social security spending at risk, which will typically grow faster than inflation.”
With the benefit of hindsight, what further recommendations might you have made, and do you still stand by what you said at the time?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. I have a mix of questions as well, given that we are nearly at the end of the evidence session. I will start almost at the beginning. You have been quite critical about the extent to which you really see the UK budget as a budget for growth. Indeed, you suggest that the OBR thinks that
“the Budget will eventually boost output in a sustainable way, but only from 2032”.
We have also heard commentary about the front loading.
Given that wider context of really limited growth—of course, Brexit is in the room as well—and the limitations on the Scottish Government, on which David Phillips is obviously an expert, having done the work on the fiscal framework, in what ways can the Scottish Government really focus on making its budget one for growth?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
Yes. You make a fair point about the budget being demand led and the implications of that.
A third aspect, which my colleague Liz Smith asked about earlier, is data. I have asked questions before about the lack of Scotland-specific data. I am thinking about inflation in particular. A lot of interesting geopolitics is going on that could impact on oil and gas, and Scotland’s economy has a reliance on that. We also have changes to national insurance contributions that could affect interest rates. What appetite is there in all the relevant institutions to make advances by starting to collect Scotland-specific data?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
I do not disagree, but I think that we would struggle to get to £262 billion.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michelle Thomson
The idea of boosting the Scottish sample size is one that I have taken up directly with the ONS.
My final question is one that I tend to ask every year. I am not up to date with the latest statistics, but we know that the cost of corruption has a fairly significant impact on UK GDP. A figure of about £262 billion each and every year for money laundering and so on was being touted three years ago. What is your thinking on that? A while ago, at the start of this year, the UK again dropped down the Transparency International corruption index, but corruption continues to take a significant amount off UK GDP.
David, I may have asked you this last year or the year before, but to what extent do you take account of the cost of corruption, given the constraints on public finances? Do you have any thoughts on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Michelle Thomson
Precisely.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Michelle Thomson
When I ask that question, I am not trying to lead you. It is not a political point; it is about programme efficiency. Fundamentally, the accountability has to be absolutely clear otherwise it leads inevitably to inefficiencies in spend and it affects the ultimate scrutiny of outcomes.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Michelle Thomson
Good morning and thank you for joining us.
I have a few questions that follow on from the themes that Kevin Stewart was exploring. We will all be familiar with accountability versus responsibility. All of the funding lines have three components—funding from the UK Government, from the Scottish Government and from the local authority. In that governance structure, who is ultimately accountable? Catherine Young, you are looking up. You can go first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Michelle Thomson
The whole change management function that you articulate is understood and people will use that as effectively as possible. However, when it comes to a key decision, it is exactly the same as when you set up a company structure. You always want to have a majority shareholder. You would never have a 50:50 shareholding because there is always the possibility that people will not agree. You need the minimum share to be 51 per cent to 49 per cent. Even though what you describe might make things marginally more effective, ultimately the accountability remains uncertain.
10:45