The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1489 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am talking about the city and regional deals.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. In that case—I am not asking for a further response—should funding be withdrawn by the UK Government at a future juncture due to the macroeconomic challenges that we have articulated, the Scottish Government would continue to have ultimate accountability for delivery without having the funding.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a couple of quick questions. Earlier, you mentioned the industrial strategy. The UK’s industrial strategy advisory council was formed in late 2024, but I am concerned about the fact that, despite the recognition that Scotland is at the heart of the net zero future, which is a critical growth sector, there is no Scottish representation on that council. Why is that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you very much for joining us. I want to ask some general questions on the funding for the deals. We know that their profile has been different, and we know there have been historical differences and so on. You may be aware that the Secretary of State for Scotland gave evidence earlier, and I asked him, in light of the forthcoming review and the general challenges in the UK economy, whether there could be an impact on city deals, given the chancellor’s expressed need to find money anywhere that she can. How strong a sense do you have of the commitment to multiyear funding and, within that, the bringing in of private sector funding? In particular, how confident will the private sector be in funding if UK Government commitments to funding are uncertain?
It is a general question and I am not bothered who goes first. Derek, you smiled.
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Does anyone else want to comment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Although the movement in bond yields, of course, was the result of recent movements, I concede that other factors are at play in the wider global economy. However, one element of bond yields is confidence in policy at UK Government level. That is one element of it, among many.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
You did not answer my direct question. My challenge is, how certain, given your articulation of the UK macroeconomy, can any city and region deal be as to the future profiling and flow of funding on a multiyear basis, given that the chancellor has been quite clear in saying that she will leave no stone unturned to look for potential cuts? This is a chance for you to put on record that the money that the UK Government has promised over a period will remain intact. Can you do that today?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
I want to move on to another topic—that of the role of this Parliament in the scrutiny of city region and regional growth deals. It has not been certain to us as a committee in what respect the Scottish Parliament has previously had a role in ensuring that the city region deals have the positive outcomes that we all want to see. What is your sentiment as to the role of this place in that regard? What is your intention with regard to giving this Parliament its place when it comes to scrutiny?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
The Scottish Council for Development and Industry—now known as Prosper—was formed in 1931 with a specific focus on industrial strategy. However, it is not represented on the council, which seems utterly bizarre. In other words, will you commit today to looking at ensuring that there is proper Scottish representation on the council to make sure that Scotland is properly at the heart of the net zero future, which is one of the critical growth sectors?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
I completely agree, and that is why I think that it is important that the body can deliver through Scotland and not just to Scotland, which is why it is important that it has genuine and adequate Scottish representation. However, I will move on, as I appreciate that your time is precious.
I could not let today’s session go by without raising the issue of Grangemouth, which, as you will appreciate, is extremely close to my heart. There has been much debate and discussion around the issue, but, in light of what we see in terms of the net zero future, my primary interest remains how we can protect and retain the skills base with whatever transition is put in place, and not only the skills base but that skills cluster, which also includes the important chemical cluster. Can you give a sense of your latest thinking on what the current situation is, for the record?