The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1499 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Before I ask Carolyn Currie a couple of questions, I have a standard question for the other witnesses. Do you routinely disaggregate all data in all surveys by gender?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
I have a final wee question. The women in enterprise review, led by Ana Stewart, was launched—I am guessing—in April this year. How actively have you been able to contribute to that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Why is that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much. Fergus Mutch, I appreciate that you work in one area and are playing two roles here, but I put the same question to you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Stacey Dingwall, I put the same question to you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, everybody, and thank you for coming along. I return to questions on modelling behaviours and elasticity, which we have talked about in relation to income tax.
I would like to get your sense of how that has been factored in with regard to ADS, which I think you said in your opening remarks is increasing from 4 to 6 per cent and is estimated to give £34 million extra. Arguably, this is even more complex because of the reasons that you set out before, and it is a newer tax as well.
What level of confidence do you have in that £34 million figure, given the range of factors, which you should feel free to outline? I have merely given my view.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
I remember that you called it out.
Professor Breedon, you keep raising your eyebrow, so you look as though you want to come in with a last comment.
11:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, panel. It is nice to see you all. We are dancing around a lot of similar areas; such is the advantage of the convener that he often asks questions that I might have liked to ask. I will follow on.
We have already heard a lot about limitations in terms of lack of borrowing powers, capital reduction and so on. I find myself thinking that, in terms of both the areas that we have talked about so far—a public sector reform programme and how to drive up productivity—surely, in behavioural terms, the fixed budget, limited borrowing powers and limited fiscal levers must influence the behavioural ambition of the Scottish Government for making a change. Such is the complexity of unintended consequences. That is the case for any Government, but surely it must be so much more of a factor for the Scottish Government. Perhaps Professor Muscatelli could give us some thoughts on that first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
Following on from that, it is obvious that a reform programme can bring efficiencies, but there is a cost to those efficiencies. Where there is a fixed budget, that cost is not so much in costs as in a reduction in spend in other areas that leads into this cycle. I would like to hear your reflections on how a fixed budget makes for real limitations in any public sector reform programme.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Michelle Thomson
When I read the letter, I saw that your title says “Sex/Gender Data”, and then you point out that
“Social Security Scotland have indicated that they would be able to provide the application form they collected on the sex, covering up to October 2022, in February 2023.”
I am trying to understand about accuracy in data terms. I am aware that we do not want to go into other big debates; that is not my intention here. The reason why I am asking is that we know that boys are statistically more likely to have learning disabilities, particularly with regard to neurodivergence. Therefore, getting the data collection correct, and linking it to biological sex. must surely be vital.
I have read your letter. You use the terms “sex” and “gender” interchangeably, and you refer to Social Security Scotland. Setting aside any other debate, the data that is collected will ultimately be used to project costs. We know that a range of factors could lead to social security payments going up, so it would be useful if you could set out what you think is happening and what will happen in future. What are your data needs? This is a question about data.