The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1489 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
It would not do any harm to wait a week, because a lot of detail has been brought out. That is my personal view; I am sure that other members will have their own views.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
On whom do you perform the credit check in that role play?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have taken another opportunity to put further commentary very effectively on the record. On the point that I asked about, aside from capacity—which, of course, is linked to funding—is there more that you feel you could have done if all things had been equal? I ask that because many of our evidence sessions are starting to feel like groundhog day for me, as we hear similar messages, and there is a commonly held understanding at the front of people’s heads that we need to do this, but something always seems to happen. That means that key groupings—not just women in business but small and medium-sized enterprises—are not necessarily thought of in the way that they should have been thought of. Is it simply an issue of capacity and funding, or is it more systemic?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Given that, and your earlier commentary about how you do not feel that the perspective of SMEs is understood—you have given various examples—what, then, is the issue? Has there been an issue with how representation has been given? Indeed, you have clarified that for me—thank you. Have SMEs not been listened to? Is it more complex than that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
I would like to bring in Vikki Manson and Duncan Thorp on that point and on my earlier challenge as to what they have proactively done, knowing what they know about the challenges.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
If you do not mind, I will make the same point again. In response to my question, you have described all the good work that you are doing with your membership organisations in pushing outwards, but my challenge is for you to say what, having identified and become aware of the city region deals that are under way in various locations, you have proactively done, on behalf of your members, in relation to those deals. That is my question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
All of you have spoken compellingly, particularly Carolyn Currie, in setting out the context vis-à-vis women. I will lay down a gentle challenge to all three of you. Given your understanding of your respective roles and how the potential for inclusive economic growth could be increased, what have you proactively done to draw the attention of particular targeted city and region deals to your existence and to your compelling messages?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
My point was about specific actions that you anticipate taking to protect the skills base during the transition period.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Derek, you spoke about how vital it is that private sector partners are involved in various deals. I presume that they will do their own risk assessments because the convening power of a commitment to public sector funding is so vital to bringing in the private sector funding. Have you heard any concerns expressed by any of the private sector partners with whom you have dealt in any of the deals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. Thank you for joining us, secretary of state. It is very much appreciated.
In your opening remarks, you correctly referenced the wider macroeconomic situation, which is, indeed, extremely challenging. I concede that you have inherited a very difficult position, but, arguably, some of the moves so far have made the macroeconomic picture even more complex and difficult, including the tax on jobs through the increase in employer national insurance contributions, and have the potential to lead to stagflation.
The chancellor is looking carefully at where further cuts might need to be made, What guarantees can you give on the UK Government’s commitment to multiyear funding? In other words, do you see that changing as a result of the macroeconomic challenges ahead?