The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Karen Adam
That makes my point, in a way. You are speaking about obesity and the correlation with food, but we know that one of the biggest factors in obesity is stress, which can involve social injustices and living in poverty. The obesity target is focused on food, but stress comes into play, too.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Karen Adam
Good morning. There is an increased budget allocation of £10 million for Marine Scotland. What is that intended to support, and what assessment has the Scottish Government made of additional Marine Scotland operational costs that are associated with EU exit?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Karen Adam
Quite a lot of my questions have been answered. I express disappointment that a UK Government minister cannot come before the committee next week as planned, and I hope that that is taken into consideration before we change our work plan again to accommodate that. It would be helpful if the session could be rearranged for any time before completion of our consideration of the Subsidy Control Bill, because we seem to have quite a lot of questions about that.
We have spoken quite a lot about agriculture, and we have touched on fisheries. What can we do to prepare our Scottish fishing industry for what is ahead in the light of EU exit?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Karen Adam
Earlier, you touched on the EMFF. Given the current situation with replacement funding, what is happening with that, and with the UK seafood fund in particular?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Karen Adam
I thank Jim McBrierty and Tom Wood for speaking so plainly. It is apparent that there has been an outstretching of hands and an attempt to build bridges between the police and the miners. The earlier witnesses said that, with the community police who they had known and grown up with and who were family and friends, there was some understanding and unity there. However, there are still discrepancies between witness testimonies, and between you and the witnesses who we heard from earlier. Even many years on, there is still some friction there.
12:00There is also what I see as a power imbalance. There is the question of where the power lay. As elected representatives, we have to remember that the police officers, the miners and their extended families, as well the communities where there were ripple effects, were all the victims, and that the people who should be held to account are those who made the decisions without thinking through the ramifications for everyone involved.
Tom Wood spoke about being careful with how pardons are implemented, and Jim McBrierty spoke about section 41(1)(a). What is your opinion on pardons for the miners? Are there alternatives that could be suggested, or are pardons the right way to go?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Karen Adam
I thank the witnesses for their candid testimony. I was young at the time of the miners strike—I was a nine-year-old girl from the north-east—but if you were to ask me about some of the most defining newsworthy moments of my childhood, the miners strike would certainly be in the top three, so it has been important to hear the witnesses’ lived experience.
I also thank Jim Phillips for keeping a record of that experience through the work that he does. It is extremely important that it is documented for history.
My question is about the pardon itself. Is there an alternative to it? Do the witnesses feel that it is the right and proper means to go about what we are trying to do?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Karen Adam
Thanks, convener. What version of the SI are we looking at, convener?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Karen Adam
It is the final draft.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Karen Adam
Okay—thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Karen Adam
Everything that you have all been talking to us about is overwhelming. It is very clear that many inequalities that have been highlighted by the Covid-19 pandemic existed before it. They are issues that women have been championing intersectionally and on which they have been trying to get the message across for generations.
It is fantastic that we are hearing from you and discussing this today, but what can we really do to make a massive shift happen? We have heard about patriarchal structures; for example, evidence that although 80 per cent of people with autoimmune diseases are women, women are less likely to take time off to go to the doctor or for childcare because of perceptions. Is there a deeper underlying cause that we need to address, on top of making the practical and policy changes that we need to make? I suppose that that is a higher-level question, but I am very interested to hear your feedback on it. The question is open to any witness who would like to come in.