The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2022
Karen Adam
I thank our witnesses for being not just insightful but educational. In particular, Davie Donaldson spoke about engagement in our constituencies with our Gypsy Traveller community. I will certainly take that away, so thank you for that.
This morning, I have heard a bit about where things in the action plan have perhaps stalled. The pandemic has been highlighted as the reason for that, of course. The pandemic aside, will each witness give me a little insight into parts of the plan that have stalled overall or been held up? We will start with Suzanne Munday.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
Although the creelers do not catch cod, I am sure that they understand the reasons for protecting cod spawning areas. They will understand that no man is an island and that, when it comes to protecting our seas and our environment, we are all in this together. I am sure that they do not take a selfish view.
How important is it that we have on-going dialogue with stakeholders, and everyone else, so that we ensure that we all understand that the closure is for the greater good of our seas and of the economic environment of our coastal communities?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
Yes, it was about how that is affected by the various competing bodies.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
I will not support the motion to annul. After hearing the evidence, I am in favour of protecting the cod spawning grounds for future generations and the future sustainability of fishing for coastal communities. I hear and understand that there are competing views on the matter and the Scottish Government has been reflective in its process, and I am glad that there will be discussions about that. I am glad that Rachael Hamilton is concerned about the wellbeing of and socioeconomic implications for fishermen in coastal areas, and I hope that we see more of that.
There are long-term implications for our fishing and coastal communities—I represent one—in relation to Brexit and the rising cost of living. Adding an environmental disaster on top of that and reducing the potential amount of cod for future generations would be too big of an impact, so I will not support the motion.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
Overall, what has been clear today is that Scotland’s marine environment is one of this country’s greatest treasures, and it is right that we continue to take robust steps to ensure that it remains a prized asset for our future generations. However, it can often be quite complex to get the balance right between competing interests, and there are potential tensions. Has there been a reasonable level of recognition of the complexity involved in taking these decisions—carefully balancing environmental, social and economic interests and using the best evidence that is available to you to protect marine species while allowing fishing activity?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
A challenge lies in the fact that we must maintain data collection that allows us to understand not only how marine systems function at various levels and locations, but how various human activities affect our seas and what action is required in different contexts. In terms of Marine Scotland’s resources, how is the methodology of capturing evidence challenged by various competing bodies, sectors and interests in a world that is—rightly—dominated by concerns about climate change? What is the potential consequence of not using the best available evidence? What would be the consequence of not taking a precautionary approach?
09:45Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Karen Adam
Is there any effect on—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Karen Adam
That is really helpful. Thank you very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Karen Adam
I thank Pauline Nolan and Jenny Miller for coming along to give evidence. You have spoken about disabled people facing additional restrictions on their activities and freedoms due to being at higher risk of more severe impacts from the coronavirus. Some disabled people needed to shield completely and felt more vulnerable to being exposed to the virus. Overall, disabled people, especially women and those receiving unpaid care, were more likely to spend extended periods without leaving their home during the pandemic.
Research shows that 16.6 per cent of people said that they had not left their house the previous week to go for a walk, to exercise or to go shopping, but the figure for disabled women rose to 25.5 per cent. Ensuring that clinically vulnerable people isolated at home was an essential part of the response to the coronavirus, but going for extended periods of time without leaving the house could have significant impacts on mental and physical health. Data suggests that that will have particularly impacted disabled people, including disabled women.
What are the witnesses’ views on that? Could lessons be learned about such scenarios that would help us in the future? I ask Pauline Nolan to come in first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Karen Adam
Thank you, Jenny. I think that Pauline would like to come back in.