The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
I would like to come in on another question; I have been pondering the budget aspect. I recognise that it is an exceptionally tough time for Governments across the board and that hard decisions have to be made, but there is a perception that people with protected characteristics are often viewed as low-hanging fruit. They are the last in and first out in terms of consideration for equalities. Oftentimes, specific cuts in budgets are looked at in silos in each department.
You might be aware that the committee has focused on human rights budgeting in a few evidence sessions. Could the lens be shifted from a siloed fiscal approach towards a whole-budget approach that looks at public sector equality duties through a human rights lens? Would that be achievable? If so, would it make a difference in delivery of the public sector equality duty?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
Good morning, and welcome to the sixth meeting in 2025 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies today. Our first agenda item is a decision whether to take in private item 4, which is consideration of a report by the Scottish Human Rights Commission, in private. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. I bring in Alyia Zaheed.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
That concludes our formal business in public. I thank you all for attending.
12:22 Meeting continued in private until 12:32.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you all. Maggie Chapman will ask the next questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
We will move on to questions from Pam Gosal.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
That brings our panel to a close. I thank the witnesses for coming along and participating. We will briefly suspend while we change over our witness panels.
11:00 Meeting suspended.
11:06 On resuming—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
Our second agenda item is evidence on the operation of the public sector equality duty in Scotland. The PSED is a legal requirement for public authorities in Scotland, which, under the duty, must consider equality when carrying out their functions. The Scottish Government is making reforms to the duty, and this inquiry will be an opportunity to explore those reforms and consider how they might improve the delivery of the duty.
We will hear from two panels this morning. I welcome our first panel: Andrew Groundwater, head of human resources and organisational development at Orkney Islands Council; Martin Ingram, principal solicitor at Aberdeenshire Council; Nareen Turnbull, service director, human resources, at the City of Edinburgh Council; and Alyia Zaheed, corporate officer, equality and diversity, at East Ayrshire Council. You are all very welcome; thank you for attending.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. Before we begin, I remind all members that rule 7.5.1 of the Parliament’s standing orders prevents members from referring to any matter in relation to which legal proceedings are active, except to the extent that is permitted by the Presiding Officer. I advise members that Sandie Peggie’s employment tribunal case against NHS Fife is considered active for the purposes of the sub judice rule and contempt of court. I have sought and received permission from the Presiding Officer on the extent to which we can explore matters related to the case today and throughout the course of our public sector equality duty inquiry. On the basis of that permission, questions on issues connected with the case are admissible, but questions on its specifics are not.
We move to questions. I will start. To what extent do you, as listed public authorities, understand the terms and aims of the public sector equality duty inquiry in Scotland? I will go to Nareen Turnbull first, please.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
Martin Ingram, would you like to come in, please?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Karen Adam
We move on to questions from Maggie Chapman.