The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 965 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
We will go back to Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. That concludes our formal business in public. I thank the minister and her officials again for attending. We now move into private session to consider the remaining items on our agenda.
12:53 Meeting continued in private until 12:57.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you, minister. Over the past few weeks, as part of our inquiry, public authorities have stated that they generally have a good understanding of the terms and aims of the public sector equality duty in Scotland, but equality organisations have suggested that, although public authorities might understand the aims, they focus too much on the process and do not make positive changes to people’s lives. The EHRC said that there are issues with the quality and consistency of compliance, and that those were reflected in the Scottish Government’s consultation in 2021. Why do you think that there is such inconsistency in compliance with the PSED in Scotland?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you very much. We will now move to questions, and I will start us off.
Over the period of our inquiry, we have noted that public authorities generally think that they have a good understanding of the terms and aims of the PSED in Scotland. However, equality organisations have suggested that, although public authorities might understand the aims, they focus too much on the process and do not make positive changes to people’s lives. What you—that is, the EHRC—have said is that there are issues with
“the quality and consistency of compliance”,
which were reflected in the Scottish Government’s consultation in 2021. Why do you think there is such inconsistency in complying with the PSED in Scotland?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
We now move on to questions from Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
We move to questions from Pam Gosal.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
We move on to questions from Marie McNair, who joins us remotely.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you very much. We will move on to questions from Tess White.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
We now have questions from Evelyn Tweed.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Karen Adam
Are members content that they have asked all the questions that they wish to ask?
Members indicated agreement.