The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Does any member object to a single question being put on amendments 449, 537 and 450?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Welcome back to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We will continue with stage 2 of the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill.
Amendment 395, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 396 to 411, 414 to 422 and 537.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
I will put the question on each amendment individually.
The question is, that amendment 449 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Amendment 449 agreed to.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
As no other members wish to come in, I call the minister to wind up.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 637, in the name of Tess White, is in a group on its own.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 468 is grouped with amendments 469, 470, 472 and 478.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 5, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 557 disagreed to.
Amendment 558 to 560 not moved.
Amendment 314 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 52, as amended, agreed to.
After section 52
Amendment 315 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 53—Ineligible or premature complaints
Amendments 643 and 563 not moved.
Amendment 316 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 53, as amended, agreed to.
Section 54—Commission process relating to complaints
Amendment 317 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Amendments 564 and 565 not moved.
Amendment 318 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Amendment 571 not moved.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 473, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 501, 502, 506 and 509 to 521.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
Amendment 503, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 504 and 505.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Karen Adam
We will suspend for a few moments to deal with the technical problems that we are having.
10:00 Meeting suspended.