The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1001 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
It is absolutely antiquated, isn’t it? I think that the system dates back to the late 1920s.
Norman, do you want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Thank you, convener—that is me done.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Good morning to the panel. I really appreciate your time. I will continue with the issue of timing. In relation to industrial injuries policy in general, things have moved extremely slowly. In the earlier session, I mentioned that we are inheriting a warehouse full of papers and legislation that has been left unreformed since its inception, all the way back in the late 1920s. To guide us on how we can bring about a quicker change in Scotland, will witnesses comment on the reasons for there having been so little progress at a UK level? Is it due to a lack of expertise, a lack of will to reform, or a mix of both? I will put that question to Ian Tasker first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
In their joint written submission, the asbestos support groups say that, ideally, the consultation on employment injuries assistance should take place alongside the consultation on SEIAC. Do witnesses see merit in that suggestion?
I put that question to witnesses in the room. Norman Provan, do you want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Anyone online? No. Back to you, convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Will the complexity involved in the safe and secure transfer of the existing cases alter the timescale that is required for the introduction of the Scottish council?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Thank you for that.
I go back to Professor Watterson. In response to question 10, your written submission states:
“A SEIAC is urgently needed to help to advise employers and employees in Scotland to recognise the full range of industrial diseases.”
What is your comment on the urgency of what is needed and on how you see SEIAC fulfilling that role? You have touched on that already, but if you could expand further, that would be great.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Marie McNair
Given what I have described and the complexity of the system, it is certainly a sorry state of affairs on which to move forward, but what we are looking for is safe and secure transfer—that is the argument that we have had. Would that approach alter the timescale that is required for the introduction of the Scottish council?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Marie McNair
As someone who was previously a councillor, I totally understand that.
Convener, the next question that I intended to ask has been covered, so I pass back to you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Marie McNair
Some respondents to the Scottish Government consultation thought that the proposal was unfair to second home owners, because they use local services less than permanent residents, and they might have already paid an additional dwelling supplement. Timothy Douglas, you have talked quite a bit about that already, but would you like to add any additional comments? Does the proposal provide a fair balance between the general interest and second home owners? It would be great to hear any additional comments that you have, although I know that a lot of that has already been covered.