The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 881 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
In order to reduce car use, are there any proven approaches already in place elsewhere that the Scottish Government could pursue in the short and longer term?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Good morning. I am interested to hear your views on what it would have taken to reach the 2030 target. You are saying that things needed to be wrapped up and the pedal needed to be put to the floor, but what does that mean in real terms?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
You spoke about cars being taken off the road. Did you mean fossil-fuel cars or electric ones?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
What can the Scottish Government do to enable that switch to electric vehicles to happen that bit quicker?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Good morning, panel, and thank you for coming. I will begin by asking for your views on the proposed disqualification orders. I am interested in hearing any thoughts or insights that you have about the level of intimidation, harassment or abuse that folk have to endure during elections. I do not mean just candidates; I mean campaigners and the hard-working electoral staff, too.
I will start with Kay Sillars, who has probably had to deal with the staff side of that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Thank you. You explained it so much better than I did.
I ask Hannah Stevens to respond next.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Are there any other provisions that the rest of the witnesses think could be considered for inclusion in the bill? Does anybody have anything to add?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
The bill makes provisions for disqualification in certain circumstances. Is there a significant issue with the harassment and intimidation of those involved in elections, including candidates, staff and campaigners, in Scotland? Are the provisions on disqualification orders suitable? Do they go far enough?
As you are looking at me, Professor Clark, I will pick on you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Indeed—I have not contributed to it, but I wish to refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I was a councillor for the first year that I was an MSP. As Edward Mountain said, my decision was based purely on trying to save public money. The cost would have been horrendous, especially during Covid, when by-elections were so expensive to run.
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jackie Dunbar
What I meant was that, currently, if someone is put on the sex offenders register, they can remain as a local councillor and there is nothing that we can do to remove them from that office. Do you think that there should be a process in the bill to remove that person, or should the situation remain as it is? I do not know whether that clarifies things.
09:15