Seòmar agus comataidhean

Regulation on the use of acoustic deterrent devices has been tightened. Has that addressed the welfare concerns in relation to cetaceans? What effect has it had on the stress factors on salmon that are caused by predators around the cages?

Good morning, panel. It has been a really interesting discussion, and it is good to hear from the scientific community on this issue.

How has the scientific understanding of fish welfare needs developed in recent years? Do you think that current welfare standards reflect the evidence? I think that we have touched on some of that already, but I would be interested in hearing your thoughts. Who wants to go first?

The Scottish Animal Welfare Commission considers that there is a need for more research on alternatives to acoustic deterrent devices in order to reduce risks to cetaceans. Can you say anything about the research on that? Are there research gaps in that or in relation to stress on salmon from seals outside cages?

I find it surprising, because I know fish farmers who care deeply about the welfare of their fish.

Yes.

I am talking about welfare.

On that point, I am looking at a news article that says:

“The RSPCA received £700,000 in membership and licence fees in 2022 from salmon farmers and producers as part of its RSPCA Assured scheme.”

Can you comment on that?

Are your standards required by regulation?

Should there be some kind of regulation around the standards that you use for your assurance scheme?

You are saying that the salmon industry has not done anything at all.