The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 857 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
I have a point of clarification. Is it not already in law that a medical practitioner may refer a patient to authorities that might be able to help with a vulnerability?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
With regard to amendment 153, the concern is the protection of patients and their wishes and the protection of healthcare professionals, as well as the provision of clarity on the patient’s decision for family members and friends. Amendments 153 and 209 make provision for the Scottish Government to bring forward a template advance care directive for patients who are accessing assisted dying. Amendment 163 would ensure that completion of the advance care directive was part of the assisted dying process by making it a requirement under schedule 2 to the bill. Amendment 156 would make the discussion of an advance care directive mandatory.
Overall, this set of amendments would help to avoid doubt with regard to patients’ intentions and would provide clarity for patients, healthcare professionals and loved ones. I have researched UK and international examples of what should be included, and this provision is standard elsewhere. Introducing this practice through the bill would give us a clear way to evaluate how these directives can work in practice.
The advance directive makes the patient’s wishes clear with regard to specific items of care that might prolong their life if they become incapacitated and cannot continue with the assisted dying process, if they become incapacitated due to the effects of the approved substance with which they may end their life, if they choose to cancel their declaration, or if they decide not to use the substance. The advance care directive cannot be used to choose assisted dying in the event of incapacity.
The template requirement is to allow a standard format for the advance care directive that fits the needs of healthcare professionals and makes information easy to locate when it is needed. The power is given to ministers to expand the care beyond what is listed, if required, in consultation with health professionals.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
No—it would come as part of the process.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
That is absolutely the intention. Not filling in an advance care directive will, in and of itself, be the completion of an advance care directive, but it must be offered.
To clarify my view, I would rather that these amendments be passed and amended at stage 3, if it is felt that they need to be amended. I want to make sure that advance care directives are available and an option for everybody. If someone decides not to fill in an advance care directive, that, in itself, will be the completion of an advance care directive.
I press amendment 153.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
Whether the decision is to opt out or opt in, our medical professionals will have patients who move from not being in a position to seek assisted dying to one in which they are. Would it not be responsible to have assisted dying training across the whole of the medical profession, given that, even though they might not want to participate in helping somebody with assisted dying, medical professionals will have care responsibilities for such patients?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
I thank Sandesh Gulhane for his intervention. As it comes from the perspective of a medical professional, it is really helpful. To clarify, my response to his first point is that it would be the notes on the assessment of the person’s right to seek assisted suicide; the amendment is not about access to all the notes.
Sandesh Gulhane made the point that a person might say something completely different to one medical practitioner from what they said to another; in that circumstance, you would surely come to a different conclusion. That is the protection that we must have; if we are going to have two independent medical practitioners making the assessment, they have to be truly independent and they both have to come to the same conclusion independently of each other. That is why I lodged amendment 155.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
I thank Liam McArthur for his engagement. To clarify, it is important not just that an advance care directive is available to patients, but that the healthcare professional ensures that there is an understanding—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
We rehearsed this a bit last week. My concern about what has been discussed is around the medical practitioner’s discussing palliative care options and giving the choice to the patient. It is only a choice if there actually is a choice. If palliative care is not available, how can it possibly be a choice? How can the medical practitioner discuss palliative care options if the patient is never going to be able to access them?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
Yes, I have concluded.
I move amendment 153.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Brian Whittle
Of course.