The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1695 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
I look forward to those discussions.
I apologise pre-emptively—I need to head off shortly after 1 pm, because the meeting has overrun.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
Thanks for joining us, Professor Jay. I do not want to dwell too much on the quote issue, but it would be useful to ask for one point of clarification. You helpfully said that you had opted for the correction to be included in the minutes of the strategic group for accessibility reasons. Was the correction added to the minutes as an addendum after the meeting, or was it discussed and agreed in a meeting of the group?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
First, I echo Jackie Dunbar’s point about the irony of having a conversation about potentially misleading comments when, within minutes of the vote on Liam Kerr’s amendment, the Conservatives put out a graphic that not only was deeply misleading but has undermined the safety of dozens of individuals about whom they have made false claims. We need to have a serious conversation, ahead of the election, about how the parties in the Parliament conduct themselves and the impact that that has on colleagues.
Cabinet secretary, a minute ago, you mentioned your frustration at the pace of change, which is a frustration that we probably all share. One of my concerns about this process is that, although it is essential that there is a review and data gathering, and a public inquiry might potentially come about, that will involve years of work before any potential actions or recommendations come out of it. There is a need to support survivors and do more right now to prevent what they have experienced from happening again.
One provision that was agreed to as part of the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill—I cannot remember whether it was included in an amendment or in the original bill—was about independent legal representation for survivors of sexual abuse. Can you give us an update on when you expect that provision to be enacted and that support to be available? My understanding is that that will cover survivors of grooming gangs.
As I mentioned in the chamber yesterday, the wider issues that we are experiencing with access to legal aid very much have an impact on survivors of such crimes, because they tend to be disproportionately care experienced and on lower incomes and would therefore be in need of legal aid. Can you provide any update on when that provision will be enacted?
10:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
Sorry, to draw on what you said, that representation is very narrow in that it relates to the rape shield. When are we expecting the enactment of the bill’s provisions on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
Grand. So it was mentioned at a meeting as well as in the minutes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
No. I am content to move on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
Cabinet secretary, can you set out what the Scottish Government has done in this parliamentary session to reduce teachers’ workload, particularly in relation to bureaucracy?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
I absolutely agree that the key to reducing teachers’ workload is the reduction of class contact. I welcome the proposals that you have set out—I think that they are pretty ambitious—but it is impossible to imagine that ambition being realised without substantial additional resource. What I am concerned about in the here and now is the unnecessary bureaucracy that teachers are still having to wade through, which it would not require additional recruitment or a significant amount of resource to reduce. As you have heard me say previously, the Scottish Government and local authorities could save money by tackling that bureaucracy. It has now been just over a decade since the tackling bureaucracy report was produced, but a substantial number of the recommendations in that report have not been implemented.
With respect, it sounds as though you are struggling to come up with an example of something that the Scottish Government has done during the current parliamentary session to reduce teachers’ bureaucracy workload.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
As tempted as I am to get into a debate around education governance—I agree that having 32 different ways of doing it is not working—going down that path would be a huge piece of work that would take a number of years. Are there not things that can be done here and now?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Ross Greer
To focus my question a bit more, my challenge to you is this: how confident are you that the work that you have commissioned will not go the same way as the 2014 tackling bureaucracy report and just sit on a shelf, and that, in 10 years, we will not all lament that it was never implemented and say, “Society has moved on, so we need another working group and another consultation”?