The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 105 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
Thank you. I am sure that we all hope that, too. We would certainly be grateful for more data on the expedite process.
How many of the 5,000-odd outstanding cases do you think have bespoke agreements?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
Finally, when do you expect to be able to share that timetable with the committee? Would it be possible to show in your blog month-on-month or quarter-on-quarter improvements alongside some of those figures?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
I alert members to my entry in the register of members’ interests.
I will start on a positive note: I have had some good feedback from professionals about some of the improvements to the service. I just wanted to pass that on. In a similar vein, I have to say that I am an avid reader of your blog, and I welcome your appearance before the committee and your willingness to share information today.
However, I hope that you will take away from this meeting the disappointment felt by the committee and by SPICe about a lack of transparency or willingness on your part to share some of your data beforehand. Indeed, the question that I would like to pursue now as a follow-up to Michelle Thomson’s questions on the back of Keith Robertson’s letter is about just that: what more data can we get?
For example, can you clarify whom the bespoke agreements are with? Are they with customers? Can you provide some sort of metric or key performance indicator for how many agreements there are and what timeframes are being agreed under them? Is it three months or a year? Are they all under a year, as you have said—and, if so, can we see that? Some of the data suggests that some cases might take 11 years. How can we see that happening?
The question, therefore, is: what further data can you share on those agreements? Also, does anybody have an appeal under them? Is it really a mutual agreement, or is it just dictated to customers?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
But how many cases in the 2017 backlog have had bespoke agreements? I am not talking about the expedite process.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
When do you expect to have an idea of that? You have said today that you expect all of them to be done within a year, but you have nothing to evidence that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
What more information can you provide on the detail of that backlog and when those cases will be completed?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Alexander Burnett
Yes, the 2017 backlog.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Alexander Burnett
Do you have an updated figure for the unspent money? I agree that you promoted the scheme—we all promoted the scheme to constituents—but, despite all the additional promotion and the extension, there was not a bigger uptake. What do you think was fundamentally wrong with the voucher scheme? People will not take something up if it is not attractive enough, so what was wrong with the scheme?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Alexander Burnett
How much is the unspent money and where will it go now?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Alexander Burnett
Good morning. Why has the voucher scheme not worked as well as you might have hoped? Why was the uptake so low? I wrote to you about the possibility of extending the deadlines for that. There are questions about why some applications for vouchers were turned down and what will happen to the unspent money. I appreciate that you might not have all those figures in front of you. Will there be a formal report or analysis of the scheme, so that we can properly scrutinise why it did not work as well as it could have done?
09:45