The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1131 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I propose that we be clear that we are not doubting or trying to claw back from the proposed change but are very supportive of it. Sue Webber makes a good point—I agree with it—but I am worried that it might be perceived as us saying, “Oh, we’re not sure that that should happen,” when it should happen.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I have a tiny question. I apologise if I missed this in the detail, but when was the list last updated?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
My initial reaction is that I am delighted that the change is happening. Deafblind Scotland is based in my constituency, and it is a fantastic organisation. It is good that the dual sensory impairment is being recognised, so I am absolutely for the change. I am not opposed to the idea of the CPG merging with the one on visual impairment, but I am absolutely happy about changing the purpose of the CPG on deafness.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
With the Horizon legislation that you mentioned, the quashing was done so that the complainants could have redress. Is that part of your reasoning for going down that route?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I understand what you are saying, and I agree that education is key, but I am still not clear whether teachers would be carrying it out.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Does that not confuse the picture a bit?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I have a tiny additional question. Maren Schroeder gave some cost figures. In the Horizon case, it worked out at about £4,000 per person. What do you estimate that the cost would be, per person, if you went down a different route?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I want to ask you more about part 2 of the bill on rehabilitation, and about education and training. On the notifications side, the bill contains what would be a new offence of failing to comply with the notification provisions “without reasonable excuse”. What would a reasonable excuse be?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Is primary legislation needed for that? Could such a requirement not simply be brought in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I will move on to ask about the rehabilitation programme. Pam Gosal, do you think that there is currently adequate provision of domestic abuse programmes—either in prison or in the community—to meet the demand that could arise if your bill were to be passed? I ask that question because it says in one of our papers:
“the requirement for assessment applies to anyone convicted of a domestic abuse offence, regardless of whether this took place before the enforcement of this section of the Bill.”
That would open it up to an awful lot of people. Are you confident that there is adequate provision for the extra people that that would bring into a rehabilitation pathway?