The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1125 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a subsequent question. Procurement is a topic that comes up regularly at this committee, and one of the regular points is about how open procurement processes are to the broadest range of firms, especially smaller firms. Will the instrument help, or is it largely to one side of that topic? I thought that it was important to raise that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I might just ask a couple of brief questions following on from that—I am not sure that they are brief, actually. This morning, we have ended up hyperfocusing on single-person billion-dollar companies and they will probably exist, but it is probably something that looks a little less dramatic that will be more pervasive. Listening to both the earlier session and this one, I wonder whether the point is that we need to focus on ensuring that people create rather than just consume, and produce rather than just process. It is very difficult to predict precisely, but following on from what you have just said, are those some of the shifts that we need to think about to ensure that we are leveraging AI? If we are just consuming and processing, AI can do that much better, but we are not really going to be part of the value chain if we are just consuming. Is that the right way of thinking about it? Is that a reasonable conclusion to draw from some of the things that we have been talking about this morning?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Great. I am tempted to ask a raft of follow-up questions, but I think I would probably be in danger of allegations of copyright theft from my fellow members, Michelle Thomson and Murdo Fraser, both of whom want to follow up on some of those points. I will hand over to Michelle and invite her to ask her questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
As members have no questions, we move to agenda item 2, which is the formal consideration of the motion. I remind everyone that only members and the minister may take part in this part of our proceedings. I invite the minister to speak to and move motion S6M-19302.
Motion moved,
That the Economy and Fair Work Committee recommends that the Public Procurement (Iraq Free Trade Agreement) (Miscellaneous Amendment) (Scotland) Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Ivan McKee]
Motion agreed to.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you very much, minister.
I begin again by asking what the instrument will mean in practical terms. My understanding is that it will essentially enable devolved bodies to use UK-wide procurement frameworks. Are there practical examples in which either that has happened or the Scottish Government or its agencies intend to use the provisions? Can you outline some examples?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Michelle Thomson would like to follow up on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
This has been a really incredible session. There have been a lot of very interesting answers. I am also intrigued to figure out which time zones you are in: the sun has been setting for Dex and has been rising for Kayla-Megan, and that has been interesting to watch. There are some very interesting things that we will definitely want to follow up on, so thank you very much for your time—I was about to say this morning, but this evening or this morning, whichever is applicable to you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
First, as somebody who graduated with a degree in philosophy 26 years ago, I say thank you very much to Kayla-Megan Burns for validating my educational choices.
I will ask Dex Hunter-Torricke a brief supplementary question. I am interested in the notion that AI tips economies of scale on their head. How far do you take the points that you set out? In 20 years’ time, to what extent will organisations be just one person configuring AI tools around them? How far will that go? I absolutely accept that you will see businesses like that, but will all businesses be like that? What will a sensible organisation look like in size and—more critically—in configuration? Will that be about how well you specify things? If we take the coding example, to get good code out of the AI, you still need to give it the right specification. Is that what the core function of an organisation will be? How far will this go? What will the functions be at the heart of organisations that seek to use AI?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have one final question. Steve Aitken, you said something quite interesting about trust. The reason why it is particularly interesting to me is that it aligned with something that I encountered recently. It also relates to things that Leo Fakhrul was saying.
I was in Singapore, and I met Enterprise Singapore there. It is always interesting, and I like looking at different Governments and their policies and their agencies. However, all too often they come up with the same stuff, and, as sure as eggs is eggs, there were a lot of things that I recognised. The people I met name-checked life sciences, they name-checked space and they name-checked AI. Those are all their growth sectors. So far, so good—you could replicate those anywhere else and, indeed, they were slightly surprised that Scotland was focusing on the same things, too; they had not realised it. What was interesting was that one of their domains for growth was the trust economy, and that replaced two things: financial services and what we would probably normally put as tech. I thought that that was quite interesting, because it was identifying something that is more essential. Rather than how you are doing things, it is what the underlying point is.
You are right. I think that there are some elements there about Scotland and trust. What are the things that you think make Scotland a place that can focus on trust and how could we build a trust economy in Scotland? What might that look like if we wanted to outcompete Singapore on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 32nd meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee.
This morning, we will be considering two Scottish statutory instruments before taking further evidence as part of our work on artificial intelligence. To begin, I note apologies from Sarah Boyack, Lorna Slater and Stephen Kerr.
I welcome Ivan McKee, Minister for Public Finance, and—online—I welcome Alasdair Hamilton, procurement policy portfolio manager, and Jess Gray, lawyer, from the Scottish Government. They will present on the SSI, and I invite Ivan McKee to make a short opening statement.