Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 March 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1187 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

Thank you very much.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

I recognise the ambition to create a level playing field, but sometimes, when regulations come into play, that does not happen. I am sure that you will monitor that to the nth degree.

I know that you recognise the issue of the distilling industry because of your constituency interests. The fact that those AD sites have not had to be authorised and are not regulated to the same degree has allowed for innovation, and I am sure that we would all want that to continue in the industry. Are discussions taking place on the potential impact of the proposed regulatory changes on distilleries that use AD? Will SEPA take all that into account as it gradually begins to regulate? This is a very sensitive area, and I do not think that anyone would want to stop the innovation that is going on. Could I have your comments on that?

10:00  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

I am not going to bite on the hydrogen prompt that you gave me, as I would have done normally.

My final question is a very simple one. You say that you are going to take a great interest in the issue, and I think that you recognise that the committee is going to take a great interest in it, too. Therefore, I ask that, as you monitor the situation, you keep committee members up to date on how we are dealing with it, considering the sensitivities.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

First, as a general comment, if somebody estimated a cost as X up to double X, I would find that a bit questionable. I do not want you to go into detail today, but it would be interesting to see your workings for all of this.

Mr Doris has already asked about the £100,000 for external consultants, and Mr Roberts, you said that you have used external consultants when the expertise has not been there. How much have you spent on external consultants in, say, the past year?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

Good morning. I turn to the subject of anaerobic digestion. Concerns have been raised by some anaerobic digestion stakeholders that the regulations will threaten the viability of non-waste anaerobic digestion plants, because of the retrofitting that they might have to do on such sites to comply with the licence conditions. A number of the folks who have concerns are those who use distillery by-products in anaerobic digestion. What does all of that mean? Can you give us assurances that those folks have nothing to fear from the changes to the regulations? How will you monitor all of that as we go forward?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

We would be grateful for that.

How many times has the same individual consultant or same organisation of external accountants been used on more than one occasion?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

Again, it would be very useful for the committee to see where you are getting the external advice from and how you are going about contracting external advisers. I agree with Mr Doris that, in some regards, it would be better if those things could be done in-house. I recognise that there are certain levels of expertise that are difficult to capture, but legal advice is not normally one of them, I would say.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

For the record, the purpose and effect documents that I talked about were the Government’s, not ones that I put together.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

Will the member take an intervention?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Kevin Stewart

I am glad to hear that, as always, Mr Doris, you are being logical about all of this. I also feel that removing the intentionality provision is a no-brainer, to use your phrase. The purpose and effect document for my amendments will have been distributed to everyone in the committee, so I am not going to go through all of that.

As always, in order to get things right, I would be happy—and I am sure that the minister will be happy—to work our way through this. We need further change in this area. We have made changes already, but I do not think that that has necessarily gone as far as it needs to.

I understand Mr Balfour’s point about the very few individuals who might try to deliberately manipulate the system, but you can see from the purpose and effect documents that my amendments cover those points.

We are still failing some people—although fewer people than before—because the intentionality provision is still in place. I want to see that gone, because we cannot afford to fail anyone in this regard. As Mr Doris said in his remarks, this is a bit of a no-brainer. However, in order to get this right, I will continue to work with folk, as I am sure that others in this room will as well.