The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1187 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you very much.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
I recognise the ambition to create a level playing field, but sometimes, when regulations come into play, that does not happen. I am sure that you will monitor that to the nth degree.
I know that you recognise the issue of the distilling industry because of your constituency interests. The fact that those AD sites have not had to be authorised and are not regulated to the same degree has allowed for innovation, and I am sure that we would all want that to continue in the industry. Are discussions taking place on the potential impact of the proposed regulatory changes on distilleries that use AD? Will SEPA take all that into account as it gradually begins to regulate? This is a very sensitive area, and I do not think that anyone would want to stop the innovation that is going on. Could I have your comments on that?
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am not going to bite on the hydrogen prompt that you gave me, as I would have done normally.
My final question is a very simple one. You say that you are going to take a great interest in the issue, and I think that you recognise that the committee is going to take a great interest in it, too. Therefore, I ask that, as you monitor the situation, you keep committee members up to date on how we are dealing with it, considering the sensitivities.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
First, as a general comment, if somebody estimated a cost as X up to double X, I would find that a bit questionable. I do not want you to go into detail today, but it would be interesting to see your workings for all of this.
Mr Doris has already asked about the £100,000 for external consultants, and Mr Roberts, you said that you have used external consultants when the expertise has not been there. How much have you spent on external consultants in, say, the past year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. I turn to the subject of anaerobic digestion. Concerns have been raised by some anaerobic digestion stakeholders that the regulations will threaten the viability of non-waste anaerobic digestion plants, because of the retrofitting that they might have to do on such sites to comply with the licence conditions. A number of the folks who have concerns are those who use distillery by-products in anaerobic digestion. What does all of that mean? Can you give us assurances that those folks have nothing to fear from the changes to the regulations? How will you monitor all of that as we go forward?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
We would be grateful for that.
How many times has the same individual consultant or same organisation of external accountants been used on more than one occasion?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Again, it would be very useful for the committee to see where you are getting the external advice from and how you are going about contracting external advisers. I agree with Mr Doris that, in some regards, it would be better if those things could be done in-house. I recognise that there are certain levels of expertise that are difficult to capture, but legal advice is not normally one of them, I would say.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
For the record, the purpose and effect documents that I talked about were the Government’s, not ones that I put together.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Will the member take an intervention?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am glad to hear that, as always, Mr Doris, you are being logical about all of this. I also feel that removing the intentionality provision is a no-brainer, to use your phrase. The purpose and effect document for my amendments will have been distributed to everyone in the committee, so I am not going to go through all of that.
As always, in order to get things right, I would be happy—and I am sure that the minister will be happy—to work our way through this. We need further change in this area. We have made changes already, but I do not think that that has necessarily gone as far as it needs to.
I understand Mr Balfour’s point about the very few individuals who might try to deliberately manipulate the system, but you can see from the purpose and effect documents that my amendments cover those points.
We are still failing some people—although fewer people than before—because the intentionality provision is still in place. I want to see that gone, because we cannot afford to fail anyone in this regard. As Mr Doris said in his remarks, this is a bit of a no-brainer. However, in order to get this right, I will continue to work with folk, as I am sure that others in this room will as well.