The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1672 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I am not so sure about that, Ms Collier, but maybe you can help us by trying to get more companies, including First in Aberdeen, to listen to their customers and not always dictate that they are right—they often cut off their nose to spite their face in terms of the amount of folk they get on buses. I have a question for Mr Solomon, because he seems to have been left out of the equation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Indeed.
How do we get to a point with logistics where we match up the opportunities of rail, sea, water and road freight transportation? Do you think that the UK and Scottish Governments have done enough in that area to see how we can do better?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
My question is on a different point. A number of comments have been made about habit. During the course of our scrutiny of the draft climate change plan, I have said a number of times that it is all a question of delivery. In order to deliver, we will need to change habits. As some folk have stated, human beings do not like change, but sometimes we can sow change if we get things right.
I want to ask about some aspects of delivery. The issue of bus gates in Aberdeen was touched on. There was a social media backlash and many folk were unhappy, but the reality is that some folk were unhappy because they felt that they had not been listened to on what was required. Is it possible that we could put too much into the plan without allowing the flexibilities that would make habit change easier? Perhaps we could hear first from Professor Davis, because he had the most to say about habit.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
You missed out one part of the question, which was about listening to people. We have all agreed that it is difficult to get folk to change, but it is easier to get people to change if they feel that they have been listened to. How do we do that better in order to ensure that we deliver?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Again, the strong message from today is that the Treasury needs to get this right and come up with multiyear funding instead of the current single-year funding that most of us, including the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government, get. Is that your view, Professor Aldred?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Ms Collier, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I have a question for Ms Collier about bus companies. Should they listen to passengers about the formulation of routes? Would that make a real difference in terms of patronage? I think that it would.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We have heard about the on-going legal arguments about whether new cryptocurrency is created with each transfer. Again, that relates to the complexity in this area that has been raised by some technologists.
You might want to bring in your team to speak about this, but I think that my very complicated question can probably be answered simply by saying that we are bringing all of this into property law.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It will not surprise anyone to hear that, like the vast bulk of the public, I have not read any of the textbooks on Scots corporeal moveables.
I will be honest with you. During the morning, I have had a discussion on WhatsApp with some anoraks about the use of some of the buzzwords—I do not think that we can call them buzzwords; I will call them technical terms—that we have used today, including “rivalrousness” and “immutables”. None of that really matters to the folk out there, because the exercise that we are carrying out is simply to put digital assets into property law and to put protections in for people through our court system. It is that simple, is it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. I have some questions about acquisition and transfer. First, however, I want to clarify something. In some regards, folk watching the evidence sessions will be baffled by some of what is being said—that is the reality—but the simple fact is that the bill is designed only to ensure that digital assets are included in Scots property law. It is that simple, is it not, minister?