The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2424 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I know that we are not here to talk about NHS Tayside but do you know why it did not? What happened?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
The report also says that
“One of the key areas of financial pressure was staff costs.”
We discussed that earlier in relation to NHS Ayrshire and Arran. Do you know the extent to which NHS Grampian relies on agency staff?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
This is my final question. Looking ahead, given the situation that NHS Grampian appears to be in, how realistic is it that it will ever break even? In paragraph 21 of your report, you say that the board is predicting an increase in costs of £370 million over the next five years. That seems to be a massive challenge. The board must cut costs, but costs are going to rise by £370 million.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Listening to the questions and answers so far, I was reflecting that we have had NHS Scotland at the committee before and my recollection was that it told us that there was to be no more brokerage. I hoped that my memory was not playing tricks on me, so I looked it up. The response to a freedom of information request on brokerage was published in September. Eight health boards needed brokerage in 2023-24. The response confirms that
“Alan Gray, Director of Health and Social Care Finance, wrote to Chief Executives of NHS Scotland on 04 December 2024 to provide the details of the indicative funding settlement for NHS Boards in the Scottish Government Budget 2025-26. The letter confirmed that brokerage would not be available for 2025-26 and that NHS Boards would be expected to work towards a breakeven trajectory in their three year financial plans”—
not five-year plans, as we have heard mentioned here, so I do not quite know how that figure has come about.
The Scottish Government’s stance appears to be “no more brokerage”. As you have said, no board has repaid any brokerage money, therefore there seems to be very little incentive to even save money—the boards have got used to having brokerage. NHS Ayrshire and Arran, as you have said, has had seven years’ worth of brokerage. Where is the incentive? It is all very well the Government saying that there will be no more brokerage, but if boards cannot meet their savings targets, there will be some more, will there not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Your report says there is a need for “more radical reform”. What did you have in mind when you used that phrase?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to ask about staffing and workforce. Paragraph 20 of the report states:
“The board also continues to face workforce challenges. The rate of sickness absence in 2024/25 was 5.6 per cent ..., well above the ... national standard, and reliance on temporary staff continues to come at a high cost to the board. This will have a significant impact on the board’s plans to achieve the savings needed for longer-term financial sustainability.”
That is something that we have discussed before at this committee. It continues:
“nursing pay was overspent by £13.5 million, £7.9 million of which was on agency nursing in acute services”
and
“medical pay was overspent by £7.7 million, £5.8 million of which was on agency doctors.”
Do you know whether the board has done any work to identify the underlying reasons for staff sickness levels? Is there any way that it can cut the reliance on agency and locum staff?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
It gives the board flexibility but it also costs it a lot of money. It is surely better to reduce the use of agency staff, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Have you seen any plan to do that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Auditor General, at the end of the earlier evidence session you rightly said that not all boards need extra money from the Government. For 2023-24, there were eight boards that needed that money: NHS Ayrshire and Arran; NHS Borders; NHS Dumfries and Galloway; NHS Fife; NHS Grampian; NHS Highland; NHS Orkney; and NHS Tayside. Do you know whether that is the position for 2024-25?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. The report into NHS Grampian’s overspend says that it has the largest overspend by value of any health board in Scotland and the fifth highest in percentage terms. Do you have figures for the overspends of other boards that could give us an indication of the extent to which NHS Grampian has the highest overspend?
11:00