The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2691 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Do you have any idea of the numbers that are involved?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
It is not quite a follow-up, convener.
Ms Lamb, last time that you were in front of the committee, you had been criticised for not visiting hospitals, and I asked you about that. However, you have told us today that, in the past few months, you have visited a number of frailty units. Now that you have been out and about and seen at first hand the problems on the ground, has that new approach of getting out of the office been useful to you in your job?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I am glad that you felt able to share that. You do not have to share such very personal things, but you have put it on the record. You spoke very well about your experience of visiting the frailty units and you have told us how useful that has been. We will leave the personal stuff, but at least you have had the chance to put it on the record.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I think that it was Michael Oliphant who mentioned the reliance on manual processes, which seems a bit bizarre in this day and age. In the pension sector, it used to be normal practice for someone to sit down and work things out manually but I would not imagine that that is the case nowadays—although it appears to be the case with the SPPA. Why has it got to the stage of people having to sit down with a pen and paper and a calculator to work things out, rather than hitting a button to get a figure?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
That is really concerning. Do you know whether SPPA has ever looked at bringing in some help from the private sector to get it through this period?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
There is a knock-on impact on ambulance waiting times, for example. There are people in hospital who do not need to be there. Ambulances turn up, bring people to accident and emergency, and there is nowhere for those people to go. There is a whole-system impact.
Mr Greive mentioned costs, but, according to the report,
“There has been no published information on the costs of delayed discharges since 2019/20.”
Why not? If we managed to do it then, why have we not managed to do it since?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Will you do that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
I will quote another bit of this very good letter. It says:
“This poor involvement and lack of support for unpaid carers risks unplanned readmission of individuals, poorer outcomes and increases the cost of caring to carers’ own health. Carers are already experiencing high levels of poor health, with 30% living with poor physical health and 36% with poor mental health.
A lack of involvement in decisions around care … has long term consequences.”
The letter goes on to talk about the 2016 act, which you have referred to, saying that Carers Scotland welcomes the call in the report—its report, not the Auditor General’s report—for
“integration authorities with their partner NHS boards and councils to ensure they fully implement their duties and responsibilities for including unpaid carers as set out in the Carers (Scotland) Act 2016.”
Given the figures that I have just quoted, it appears that the duties in the act are not being met—why not?
10:15
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
It seems to me that we have an act that was brought in 10 years ago but the requirements in that act are not being fulfilled. You accept that they should be fulfilled, but we really need to do better, do we not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
You agree—okay. How are we going to do better? If we come back here in a year’s time, will the figures be better?