Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 March 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1808 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 27 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Can you provide some clarity on the phrase “international standards” in amendment 1088? The amendment suggests that there should be a review of women’s refuges that considers international standards, but standards across the world will vary—there will be different standards in every country. I am not sure what you want to achieve with the amendment. I acknowledge that you are not going to move it, but do you see the problem there?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Graham Simpson

I convened the DPLR Committee in the previous parliamentary session, and I agree with Jeremy Balfour. He is absolutely right to say that regulations are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as primary legislation, however much we might like them to be.

This morning, we have seen the great deal of scrutiny that primary legislation goes through. It has been a great process so far. I know that it is taking longer than you might wish, but that is the primary legislation process, and the committee is doing a fantastic job. Regulations are not subject to the same level of scrutiny, so we need to be very careful about using them.

I urge the minister to take up Mr Balfour’s suggestion, and I make the same point—we need to look at the issue again at stage 3.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Graham Simpson

In the previous session of Parliament, the Local Government and Communities Committee produced a report on homelessness. We visited Finland, which uses housing first—Mr Doris was with me on the trip—and we recommended that we have a system of housing first. My good friend Mr Kevin Stewart was the housing minister at the time. Subsequently, we have an element of housing first in Scotland, although it is probably not as widespread as I would wish. However, it seems to me that, in his amendment and in his words, Mr Griffin is describing the way that housing first ought to work. Is he saying that it is not working in the way that it should?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Graham Simpson

To be clear, is the minister saying that housing first is not defined in legislation? It seems to me that Mr Griffin is attempting to put some meat on the bones of how the housing first approach ought to operate in Scotland. Is the minister opposed to that?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Graham Simpson

I want to be clear about what the minister is saying. Is he saying that he accepts the broad principle behind Mark Griffin’s amendments and that he wants to work with Mr Griffin and others on stage 3 amendments, or is he saying something else entirely? Is he saying that, because legislation already exists, everything is fine, or is he saying that he will bring something back at stage 3?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay—that is useful. Auditor General, you mentioned that the project board that has been set up will not report until 2028, and the convener made the very good point that that will be too late for many children. What is your view on that? Should it report sooner? It seems to be operating at a snail’s pace.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Stuart McMillan mentioned paragraph 16, which mentions people waiting for their children to be diagnosed for things such as autism. Do we have any data on how many children are on the waiting list for such a diagnosis and whether that has got worse year on year?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Graham Simpson

It is across the piece.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Graham Simpson

So you do not have that data.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Graham Simpson

The convener invited me to ask about funding, so I guess that I had better do that or I will incur his wrath, and I do not want to do that.

Your briefing notes that

“Funding allocation methodologies for councils do not reflect the ASL legislation, the presumption of mainstreaming and the continued growth in recorded additional support needs.”

How does that misalignment impact councils’ ability to deliver adequate support for pupils with ASL needs?