The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1808 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Can you provide some clarity on the phrase “international standards” in amendment 1088? The amendment suggests that there should be a review of women’s refuges that considers international standards, but standards across the world will vary—there will be different standards in every country. I am not sure what you want to achieve with the amendment. I acknowledge that you are not going to move it, but do you see the problem there?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Graham Simpson
I convened the DPLR Committee in the previous parliamentary session, and I agree with Jeremy Balfour. He is absolutely right to say that regulations are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as primary legislation, however much we might like them to be.
This morning, we have seen the great deal of scrutiny that primary legislation goes through. It has been a great process so far. I know that it is taking longer than you might wish, but that is the primary legislation process, and the committee is doing a fantastic job. Regulations are not subject to the same level of scrutiny, so we need to be very careful about using them.
I urge the minister to take up Mr Balfour’s suggestion, and I make the same point—we need to look at the issue again at stage 3.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Graham Simpson
In the previous session of Parliament, the Local Government and Communities Committee produced a report on homelessness. We visited Finland, which uses housing first—Mr Doris was with me on the trip—and we recommended that we have a system of housing first. My good friend Mr Kevin Stewart was the housing minister at the time. Subsequently, we have an element of housing first in Scotland, although it is probably not as widespread as I would wish. However, it seems to me that, in his amendment and in his words, Mr Griffin is describing the way that housing first ought to work. Is he saying that it is not working in the way that it should?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Graham Simpson
To be clear, is the minister saying that housing first is not defined in legislation? It seems to me that Mr Griffin is attempting to put some meat on the bones of how the housing first approach ought to operate in Scotland. Is the minister opposed to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to be clear about what the minister is saying. Is he saying that he accepts the broad principle behind Mark Griffin’s amendments and that he wants to work with Mr Griffin and others on stage 3 amendments, or is he saying something else entirely? Is he saying that, because legislation already exists, everything is fine, or is he saying that he will bring something back at stage 3?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay—that is useful. Auditor General, you mentioned that the project board that has been set up will not report until 2028, and the convener made the very good point that that will be too late for many children. What is your view on that? Should it report sooner? It seems to be operating at a snail’s pace.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Stuart McMillan mentioned paragraph 16, which mentions people waiting for their children to be diagnosed for things such as autism. Do we have any data on how many children are on the waiting list for such a diagnosis and whether that has got worse year on year?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
It is across the piece.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
So you do not have that data.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Graham Simpson
The convener invited me to ask about funding, so I guess that I had better do that or I will incur his wrath, and I do not want to do that.
Your briefing notes that
“Funding allocation methodologies for councils do not reflect the ASL legislation, the presumption of mainstreaming and the continued growth in recorded additional support needs.”
How does that misalignment impact councils’ ability to deliver adequate support for pupils with ASL needs?