The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1987 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument revokes and replaces the Environmental Protection (Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and other Dangerous Substances) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025, which the committee considered at its meeting on 4 March. The previous instrument was defective due to an error in the statutory consultation process, as narrated in correspondence from the Scottish Government to the Presiding Officer, which will be published in the committee’s report on the subordinate legislation that has been considered at today’s meeting. Specifically, the Scottish Government erroneously overlooked, and therefore did not consider, one of the responses to the consultation.
Under section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, an instrument subject to the negative procedure must be laid at least 28 days before it comes into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days. The instrument breaches that requirement, as it was laid on 18 March 2025 and will come into force partially on 30 March 2025.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament under reporting ground (j), for failure to comply with laying requirements, as it was not laid 28 counting days before it will come into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
With that, I move the committee into private session.
10:07 Meeting continued in private until 10:26.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 11th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to please switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on whether to take items 3 to 6 in private. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we will consider one instrument, on which an issue has been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the reasons provided by the Scottish Government for its failure to comply with the laying requirements?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Paragraph 16 of the briefing touches on the fact that accessing ASL can require a diagnosis by a specialist before support can be provided. Will you provide a bit more information and detail on how that impacts the broader understanding of ASL provision in Scotland?
10:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
First, I will just make you aware that I chair the cross-party group on visual impairment and I am the deputy chair of the cross-party group on dyslexia.
I found the briefing fascinating. It certainly highlighted a few different areas for consideration, to say the least. I have been working with a local additional support needs group for the past nine months, so that has helped to frame some of my thinking about the briefing.
The first issue that I picked up on is the bullet point on annually published data in the recommendations. My first consideration of that was that it might lead to an unintended consequence of having league tables that people would look at and use to pit one local authority against another.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
One key point that constituents consistently make to me is that every child with an additional support need is different. You can say that about every child, of course, but when it comes to attempting to catch the data that is missing, I can understand why there are gaps. It will be very difficult to be accurate about that. Therefore, I appreciate that there are gaps, and I appreciate, too, the challenges that are faced by local authorities in trying to get that data. Getting a solution in this area will be difficult, to say the least.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you—that would be helpful. I appreciate the caveat that every country will have its own methodology and education system.
I now want to look at paragraph 46 onwards. Earlier, you touched on exhibit 5 on page 23 of the briefing, which illustrates the huge rise in the number of classroom teachers supporting ASL. For me, though, paragraph 50 is crucial as we look ahead and gives people a lot more food for thought with regard to where we go.
I am keen to find out whether you can provide more detail on the factors that might explain the increase in ASL support being provided by teachers since 2019. How much of that is due to improved data recording or increased awareness, and to what extent do the data gaps affect the Scottish Government’s ability to make informed decisions about resource allocation and staffing?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Stuart McMillan
Finally, are you confident that mainstream and special education have the capacity to accommodate the increase in demand for ASL support?