The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 782 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
On the issue whether there is potential for consensus within the industry about what changes would be beneficial, are the views too diverse for that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Does anyone else have views on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
I was going to come on to politicisation in a moment, but I wonder whether Emily Oyama has anything to add.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Do I have time for one final question?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Convener, I wanted to come on to some of the wider issues in the broadcasting inquiry, so I do not know whether you want to allow anyone who wants to ask about STV to come in first.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Okay—thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I have a couple of questions on charter renewal and one more general question.
My first question was going to be on the issue of quotas and criteria—we have covered some of that ground already. The green paper seems to indicate that the Government is open to change in that area. I wonder whether there is any prospect of the various voices from Scotland alighting on a consensus about the specific changes that would be beneficial. Judging from the comments that have been made and the written submissions that we have received, quite a number of people seem to be suggesting that change is necessary, but they do not necessarily agree on what that change ought to be.
In principle, do you think that there is potential for consensus—I do not just mean in the committee and in our report, but within the industry—about what changes to the quotas and criteria would be beneficial, or is the range of views too diverse?
I recognise that a great deal of that needs to be about the economics of the industry, as David Smith said; it needs to be about skills, where IP is owned, and so on. Is there a role for criteria—this is an as well as, rather than an instead of—around the audience perception of what is being produced and whether a production feels like it is of or about Scotland?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
Thank you. My second question was about politicisation, which Paul McManus started to talk about. The Bectu submission addresses the issue of politicised appointments to the BBC board. That is not the only aspect of the problem, as the BBC can quite fairly be accused of being part of the mainstreaming and normalisation of far-right, racist and culture war narratives in recent years. What changes in the charter could help to address that, perhaps either by removing political appointments that have been made in the past or by changing the rules about how they are made in the future?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
The bigger factors here are technological change and its take-up, as well as audience behaviour. Are those factors likely to drive traditional broadcasting towards an ever smaller niche?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Patrick Harvie
As I have said on previous occasions, I strongly share the concerns that members have expressed about STV, but we also have the inquiry into broadcasting, and we are now left with very few minutes to explore some of those issues. I suggest that, after the session, we might follow up in writing with some additional questions on that area.
In the time available, I ask you to respond to the suggestion that we are all—Parliaments, Government, the regulator and industry—currently having far too narrow a conversation about how the regulation of our media landscape needs to change. The reason I suggest that is because we are talking about whether, or how, to continue or adjust arrangements that have their origins in a time when public service broadcasting was utterly dominant in the media landscape. It set the tone and the agenda for the rest of the industry, set audience expectations profoundly and shaped the media landscape in a way that is no longer the case.
The public service broadcasters remain very important, but they are players within a much wider landscape, some of which is, to be frank, the wild west and is much less significantly regulated. We are moving into an area—as you have said in response to other members—in which some of those public service broadcasters will be specifically trying to put their content on to completely unregulated platforms. Their content may be produced in a regulated way, but it will be completely intermingled with opinion presented as fact, conspiracy theories, extremist content, AI slop, rage bait and AI-generated images.
While it seems that the rules on the creation of intimate AI images are now going to be enforced, we have no similar rules on the use of AI to propagate conspiracy theories, damage people’s reputations, manipulate share prices or affect election results. Public service broadcasters’ content will be entirely intermingled with all that wider content, in every sense. The regulatory arrangements, which were designed to ensure that people have a media landscape that they can broadly trust, will remain utterly ineffective. I ask you to respond to the suggestion that we need a much broader approach to regulation of the media landscape.