The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1072 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
Thanks.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
I want to turn to the pathway to achieving the decarbonisation of freight. In relation to that transition, the climate change plan places a large amount of focus on the decarbonisation of HGVs and vans. From personal experience, I think that steady progress is being made in the van market, but there has not been so much progress in the HGV sector. Mr Solomon, how many of the HGVs that are operating in Scotland or across the UK are electric? What does the operational pathway to the electrification of the HGV sector look like over the next 10 to 20 years?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
I take it from what you are saying that, largely, the HGV sector does not feel that the existing technology for electric HGVs is mature enough to be an attractive investment and to meet operational demands. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
Given that the objective of the draft climate change plan is to reduce emissions from things such as HGVs, you are saying that it would be more pragmatic to look at drop-in fuels rather than electrification, which feels like a bit of a pipe dream at present. The problem is that using things such as HVO is effectively offshoring by importing fuel, as opposed to making stuff domestically in Scotland or the rest of the UK that could be used as a drop-in fuel. However, there is insufficient Government support for that. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
I have a question on the concessionary travel schemes, which is probably for Sara Collier, given that her members benefit the most from those as bus operators. In this financial year, the Scottish Government will spend £414.5 million on its two concessionary travel schemes. In the draft climate change plan, in the part about transport outcomes and seeking to reduce car usage, one of the key policy areas to help to achieve car usage reductions is said to be the concessionary fare schemes for older persons and the under-22s. Is there any evidence that the £414.5 million that is being spent in this financial year has any impact whatever on reducing car emissions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
Let me turn to Adrian Davis on the important element of behaviour change in trying to create modal shift. Concessionary travel can play a part in helping to support modal shift, but, if we do not have a wider range of policies that act more like a stick to get people to make use of it, it becomes quite a blunt instrument with quite a high price tag attached and without any real benefits being gained from it, from a climate change perspective. In the draft plan, is there a sufficient suite of other interventions wrapped around the concessionary travel scheme elements to create the type of behaviour change that is necessary?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
Is that information available?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
We are not just going to import stuff for the purpose of doing it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
I suspect that the whole issue around preventative spend goes back to the Christie commission and trying to make that long-term investment in order to get wider societal benefits. The problem is that, very often, the political cycle does not lend itself to that type of investment. I was struck by Rachel Aldred’s point about the need for long-term investment, which a couple of you have also made. The challenge that the Scottish Government will have is that it does not know what its budget will be next year, because it is, by default, set from the UK Government’s budget. That political process issue compromises some of those other issues.
That brings me to the question that I would like to ask Adrian Davis and Rachel Aldred. You do not feel that the transport provisions in the draft climate change plan are sufficient to achieve the reductions in transport emissions that are needed to tackle climate change. Adrian, you rattled off four examples of areas of transport in which we get good bang for our buck in relation to impact. You mentioned congestion charging, road reallocation and the enforcement of parking restrictions—I am sorry, but I missed the fourth example that you gave. If you feel that the transport provisions in the existing plan are insufficient and that there are clear policies that would, if implemented, have a marked impact, why do you think that those policies are not in the plan and the Government is not pursuing them?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Matheson
You say that a more pragmatic and realistic route for the decarbonisation of HGVs involves using alternative low-carbon fuels, such as drop-in fuels, which you mentioned. Are you talking about things such as hydrotreated vegetable oil being used as an alternative? Is that the type of thing that you are referring to?