The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1171 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
So, an independent person would review the matter.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
There are only so many mitigation measures that can be put in place, so there will be only so much mitigation that can be done. Given the Scottish Government’s ambition to reach 40GW of offshore wind by 2040, where we are in the delivery pipeline in Scottish waters, as well as there obviously being a pipeline in England and Wales, what will be the process to ensure that it is not simply a case of first come, first served? If you drop all the scope mitigations that could be put in place outwith your own project, that could result in projects further down the line finding that there is not much left for them to do. It will not be quite like that—I am putting it in a fairly crude way—but I am trying to think about how we can ensure that we are giving as much scope as possible to maximise the process in a way that keeps in mind that it will be way into the 2030s before some projects are delivered and that there is a need to ensure that there are still some mitigation measures that they can help to support, when it comes to the point at which they need to do that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I am not asking for the exact threshold. I presume that the decision would be made on the balance of probabilities, rather than a requirement that the evidence was beyond reasonable doubt. I am trying to establish the evidential threshold.
It would be a civil matter, not a criminal matter and, therefore, I presume that the threshold would be the balance of probabilities. A criminal matter in the courts has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt but, obviously, a court of law will not be determining those matters.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
So, decisions would be made on the balance of probabilities
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
If there was that requirement, you would have to be calling witnesses, et cetera, so decisions will have to be made on the balance of probabilities. Surely, that is the settled position.
That means that, if someone commits an offence on a bus and they are subsequently convicted for it in a criminal court, they will lose their pass. It does not matter what the offence is. As soon as that person is convicted, they will have been convicted on a higher threshold than is required for the removal of their bus pass. It seems to me that, if someone commits a serious offence on a bus and they are convicted of it, they will lose their pass—without a doubt.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I know of specific cases in which it is just that you did not have the internal capacity to deal with the application.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I will stick with the subject of your role as a statutory consultee in the consenting and planning process, initially with regard to on-land projects and developments. In the course of the past year, have any projects that went to planning been delayed as a result of NatureScot not having the capacity to respond within the timescale for consideration of the planning application?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
It looks as though, on occasions, you do not meet the timeframe. You are not clear about exactly why that is the case, and you do not know the figure for the number of cases in the past year in which you have not been able to meet the timeframe as a statutory consultee for local planning matters. Pete Higgins, what sort of discussion takes place at the board in relation to the executive team’s oversight of these matters?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
We are in a situation where the chief executive does not know the figure for the past year but we do know that there are delays that have an impact on live planning applications, for which you are the statutory consultee, and, to date, the board has had no oversight of that. Is that correct?