Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 March 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 293 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Roz McCall

Will the minister take an intervention?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Roz McCall

The Promise is very clear about that being included in primary legislation, minister. Are you suggesting that any move forward would be done through guidance, and, if so, how can we meet the Promise that we are all tied to and which we agreed to meet?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Roz McCall

I am grateful to be able to speak on this today. My amendment is very simple and would allow legislation to be amended to meet the promise that this Parliament made on housing to the care-experienced community. Ensuring housing priority for people who have experience of the care system is a fundamental part of the Promise, but we know that the process for housing varies between local authorities. From disparities in council tax to issues with permanent accommodation, guidance is not fulfilling the housing hope for the care-experienced community.

Groups including Who Cares? Scotland and the Promise oversight board have raised concerns on the issue. My amendment hopes to address that imbalance and ensure that the process is enshrined in primary legislation rather than in guidance.

Although I support Pam Duncan-Glancy’s amendments 1058 and 1060, the care community is concerned about the assumptions with regard to leaving care. I know that we are looking at the younger people in the care community, but the community is very concerned about the care leaver process, in particular as we know that trauma is lifelong. The amendments would possibly limit the housing options by age, and I would prefer that the commitment in the Promise was met in full. Nevertheless, I understand the objective behind the amendments, and I am very supportive of them, especially considering the support that they would provide for our young people.

The Promise has been agreed by all parties and, as much as it is hoped that there will be progress made in the proposed Promise bill, it is concerning that, in that regard, time is scarce to meet the 2030 deadline. As I said, my amendment hopes to speed up that process.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Roz McCall

I want to follow on from Bob Doris’s earlier points.

There are some elderly people, including in my family, who struggle because of the way the world has moved on and things have moved to digital—for example, my mum is not a big fan of doing anything online and gets confused by jargon. Have we made the process of claiming benefits a little bit harder for elderly people?

Is there an argument that we need to look not only at the benefits that are in place and how they stack up but at how we are going about the process? Are we putting in enough support at the right stages to allow people to apply for what they should be applying for? Only 65 per cent of eligible households are receiving pension credit. To me, that is just wrong. Have we got the process right?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Pensioner Poverty

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Roz McCall

That was very helpful, Debbie. Thank you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Colleges Regionalisation Inquiry: Post-Inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Roz McCall

That is very interesting.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Colleges Regionalisation Inquiry: Post-Inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Roz McCall

That is interesting.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Colleges Regionalisation Inquiry: Post-Inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Roz McCall

Hello, everyone. Thank you for being here.

Colleges have some great links with schools and some fantastic links with small and medium-sized enterprises. I know that there are challenges and positives when it comes to establishing links, but I am interested in how that is going. When I was at Fife College recently, I heard that it could not obtain a single placement for its social care course for a whole year—it simply could not offer that side of the course.

Given that you are building links with SMEs, what has the process been like since the flexible workforce development fund came to an end? Can you give us an idea of how that is going?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Colleges Regionalisation Inquiry: Post-Inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Roz McCall

Thank you very much indeed.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Roz McCall

Thank you. I have no relevant interests to declare.