The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 293 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Roz McCall
Will the minister take an intervention?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Roz McCall
The Promise is very clear about that being included in primary legislation, minister. Are you suggesting that any move forward would be done through guidance, and, if so, how can we meet the Promise that we are all tied to and which we agreed to meet?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Roz McCall
I am grateful to be able to speak on this today. My amendment is very simple and would allow legislation to be amended to meet the promise that this Parliament made on housing to the care-experienced community. Ensuring housing priority for people who have experience of the care system is a fundamental part of the Promise, but we know that the process for housing varies between local authorities. From disparities in council tax to issues with permanent accommodation, guidance is not fulfilling the housing hope for the care-experienced community.
Groups including Who Cares? Scotland and the Promise oversight board have raised concerns on the issue. My amendment hopes to address that imbalance and ensure that the process is enshrined in primary legislation rather than in guidance.
Although I support Pam Duncan-Glancy’s amendments 1058 and 1060, the care community is concerned about the assumptions with regard to leaving care. I know that we are looking at the younger people in the care community, but the community is very concerned about the care leaver process, in particular as we know that trauma is lifelong. The amendments would possibly limit the housing options by age, and I would prefer that the commitment in the Promise was met in full. Nevertheless, I understand the objective behind the amendments, and I am very supportive of them, especially considering the support that they would provide for our young people.
The Promise has been agreed by all parties and, as much as it is hoped that there will be progress made in the proposed Promise bill, it is concerning that, in that regard, time is scarce to meet the 2030 deadline. As I said, my amendment hopes to speed up that process.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Roz McCall
I want to follow on from Bob Doris’s earlier points.
There are some elderly people, including in my family, who struggle because of the way the world has moved on and things have moved to digital—for example, my mum is not a big fan of doing anything online and gets confused by jargon. Have we made the process of claiming benefits a little bit harder for elderly people?
Is there an argument that we need to look not only at the benefits that are in place and how they stack up but at how we are going about the process? Are we putting in enough support at the right stages to allow people to apply for what they should be applying for? Only 65 per cent of eligible households are receiving pension credit. To me, that is just wrong. Have we got the process right?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Roz McCall
That was very helpful, Debbie. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Roz McCall
That is very interesting.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Roz McCall
That is interesting.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Roz McCall
Hello, everyone. Thank you for being here.
Colleges have some great links with schools and some fantastic links with small and medium-sized enterprises. I know that there are challenges and positives when it comes to establishing links, but I am interested in how that is going. When I was at Fife College recently, I heard that it could not obtain a single placement for its social care course for a whole year—it simply could not offer that side of the course.
Given that you are building links with SMEs, what has the process been like since the flexible workforce development fund came to an end? Can you give us an idea of how that is going?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Roz McCall
Thank you very much indeed.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Roz McCall
Thank you. I have no relevant interests to declare.