The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1814 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
There is a general understanding that that is what we should be doing, but, specifically, how do you see fostering good relations linking to budgetary conversations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. I have a final, very quick question. Is there a shining example of fostering good relations that you could tell us about?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for being here. My questions are on balancing protected characteristics and the fostering good relations element of the PSED, but before I come to that, I will pick up on what you both said in your previous answers.
Minister, you said earlier that the PSED is procedural. We heard from the EHRC, which was on our first panel this morning, that there needs to be a shift away from thinking of it as procedural and towards using it as more of a tool. What conversations have you had with EHRC about that? How has it informed your conversations with other public bodies and within the Scottish Government?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Is there also a role for political leadership in this area? How do you see the political context of debates and discussions around race feeding into that? What should we, as parliamentarians, you, as the EHRC, and all of us who have an interest in and a responsibility with regard to the notion of fostering good relations be doing differently?
10:45
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Given that we were talking about SFC matters, I should declare an interest: I am the rector of the University of Dundee,
My next question will cover an issue that you were hinting at there. If we take the notion of how we understand and promote fostering good relations as a tool, how could the Government and local authorities better incorporate it into budget conversations—that is, not only in budget decisions but in all the conversations that lead up to those decisions?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I want to focus on balancing characteristics and fostering good relations. It has been a bugbear of mine for some years that there has been limited understanding of, and virtually no conversation about, what fostering good relations means, and you have picked up on that. It has been very much the poor cousin of the various elements of the public sector equality duty. Why do you think that it is so hard for public bodies to grasp what fostering good relations means and what such a process should look like? In your view, what would good practice look like when it comes to fostering good relations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
I will come to the guidance in a moment, but when you talk about confidence, do you mean confidence in doing something or confidence in understanding what fostering good relations means? I think that those are two different things, and I see weaknesses in both. Which are you referring to?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Jennifer, do you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Do you get a sense from any of your conversations with Police Scotland, either as part of the uniformed services project or elsewhere, that the notion of balancing needs—as opposed to risks—is sometimes used as an excuse to do nothing?