The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 872 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
I thank the individuals who engaged with the committee on the issue and who have sent representations to individual MSPs. I also thank the clerking team for their efforts to engage with those who have living experience of the situation, to try to ensure that their voices could be heard, which is not an easy task. That was one of the things that I felt was missing from the evidence that we took, but it was not for want of trying by the clerking team.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Is the no-wrong-door approach fundamental to engaging with a person and the totality of their needs as they present?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you—that was very helpful. Do the other witnesses have anything to add?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
It was about a treatment determination being made in person.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. I want to spend a bit of time discussing families, carers and advocacy. The bill provides for family members to be included when treatment is sought in the first instance, but it is silent on the whole-family approach and family-inclusive practice. If the bill proceeds, does that aspect need to be strengthened, to reflect what local areas are already doing? You will all be very familiar with family-inclusive practice. Who would like to comment on that? I will start with Kelda.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
It is partly about assessing the family’s need.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Referring back to the earlier points about how you support someone once they get to the abstinence stage of treatment, do you think that it is a question of people being rooted in a support network that includes their family and the wider community back at home?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
That answer is brilliant, because my next question is about whether there is a risk of impacting the availability of services for people who would wish to access treatment that does not require a formal diagnosis in different settings away from the medical setting. Is that risk a worry to you? I see nodding heads.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
I want to explore the impact of the label “addicted”, which is a contested term—some people like it but others do not. I am wondering about the interaction with the Equality Act 2010, because addiction is not a protected characteristic under that act when it comes to things such as employment law. Does anybody have a comment on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you for that. My final question is about the fact that, under the bill, a treatment determination should be made “in person”. Would that, in itself, cause any problems? As we know, treatment is, for example, delivered by teleconference in some remote and more rural areas. I do not know whether anybody has a comment to make on that.