Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2055 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Good morning. I want to follow up on what the convener was asking about in relation to the public sector reform programme. To be a success, it will require a culture change in the leadership team. Can you outline what that means to you and how confident you are that you can deliver it?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Yes, but I am talking specifically, rather than generally. Specifically, it is unheard of for the Scottish Information Commissioner to comment using terms such as “disjointed” and “chaotic”. He is talking directly. There have been a variety of threads, as you know, on the issue of FOI requests around the Hamilton inquiry, but what the commissioner has said is a particularly strong way of expressing things, and he is expressing his own dealings with the situation. I am trying to get a sense of how concerned you are and what you are going to do about it, because it is fundamentally affecting trust in the Scottish Government.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Confidence in transparency is generally not helped by a lack of confidence in someone obeying the rule of law. It is nearly a year since the Supreme Court judgment on 16 April 2025 in For Women Scotland Ltd v the Scottish ministers. Whether it is raised in the debating chamber or a committee, the official Scottish Government line—I am paraphrasing—is “We are working hard to obey the law”, which is another way of saying “We are still currently breaking it”. That strikes me as somewhat Trumpian. It was only yesterday that LGBT Youth Scotland—which is, of course, funded by the Scottish Government—put out guidance contrary to the Supreme Court ruling in that it did not comply with the School Premises (General Requirements and Standards) (Scotland) Regulations 1967 or the Equality Act 2010. What on earth is going on? Why can the Scottish Government not obey the law?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

What assessment are you making in relation to further court cases coming forward? Obviously, we have a court case in train at the moment in relation to men in women’s prisons, but, as I understand it, other court cases are being developed. There was a section 35 order in relation to gender recognition, and the costs for that are about £1.2 million, plus there is the Sandie Peggie case, which has cost about £400,000 so far. Other court cases will come forward while this issue is not addressed. Are you making an assessment of the potential costs, given the critical public finance constraints?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Okay. Thank you.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

My last wee question is about an issue that I have brought up previously. There are quite limiting rules for SNIB in relation to its ability to recycle financial returns from successful investments into new deals. The Economy and Fair Work Committee has already written to the Treasury on that and got a perfunctory response, so we have had to write back. SNIB is another example of where we could try to find ways to stop inhibiting the ability to generate growth in the economy. That matter is not even in your portfolio, but I wonder whether you could comment on it.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Yes—you have changed some of the Scottish Government rules.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

Thanks.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

I can see that the global situation will be on the risk register, but I am talking about the plans themselves. I am sympathetic to the point about what the Government can and cannot put in the SSR, because the only thing that we can be certain about is that it will be wrong—that is just the way it is. However, the impacts might quickly flow in for some near-side projects. As well as putting the global situation on your risk register, are you considering the potential impact on plans that are in train and, critically, on budgets?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michelle Thomson

I completely agree, because if what is needed in the face of such uncertainty is growth, the fiscal framework—or, more specifically, its limitations, particularly the lack of borrowing powers for capital, which is quite fundamental—restricts the Scottish Government’s ability to encourage growth.

I want to ask about a few other things that sort of fold into that. The first is flexibility in funding. Two weeks ago, in our evidence session with Police Scotland, we were told that when the forces merged to establish Police Scotland, the organisation lost its power to borrow and to hold reserves. The witness mentioned that Police Scotland was discussing the issue with you. Those aspects were described as

“incredibly important tools for us”.—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 24 February 2026; c 26.]

Following on from that—although it did not come up in that evidence session—is the issue of flexibility for colleges. The sector believes that it is being restricted in its use of, for example, the college transformation framework funding to focus on encouraging growth.

It would be useful to get a quick update on both those issues.