The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1921 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Okay.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Alistair Mackie wants to come in.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Sorry, Alex. This question might be for either one of you. In fact, it is a gentle challenge for all of you.
Alistair said that the RSNO has managed to increase its income by something in the order of 30 per cent since 2009, but the fact is that all the national performing companies have managed to increase their income in the face of diminishing grants. Therefore, I would argue, for the sake of discussion, that you should have been doing more.
The Government might think, “Well, you’ve managed.” When Alistair appeared in front of the Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee, he talked about setting up an endowment fund. Although I am not disagreeing with any of you—I am a very strong supporter of the arts—I can see why the Government might say, “Look at what you’ve managed to do with a real-terms cut.” Hence my challenge about whether you have been doing enough.
I want to pick up on the multiyear funding element and ask whether that is flowing through. I can see that Liam Sinclair wants to come in as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
My question goes back to the opening thread. We are the finance committee, so I want to ask you all about your hopes and expectations with regard to today’s budget. Moreover—and this leans into a lot of the talk about multiyear funding and the commitments made in that respect—can you tell us, with an honest reflection that we are not living in a perfect world, what perfection would actually look like?
I do not know who wants to come in on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
I feel as if that question has, in some respects, taken us straight in with our heavy brogues on. Before I move on, I will take it up a level to get your reflections on the fact that that you are in front of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. One of you may wish to answer first, but I would like to get a sense from all of you of how important you think financial sustainability is. I may come to you first, Alistair, because the RSNO report came out before the wider report into all the national performing companies. In your role as chief executive of the RSNO, how much importance do you give to financial sustainability, how much is that supported by the board and how much is it encouraged by Government? In other words, what was the trigger for your producing that report?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Yes. My apologies.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
I could see nods of agreement around the table, but I want to pick up on a comment that the convener made about the simple maths—I realise that it does not particularly work like that—of looking at the joint NPC figures minus the RSNO figures. The wellbeing-adjusted life years—the WELLBY measures—are valued at £40.5 million for all the NPCs. If you take out the RSNO figures and spread the remainder roughly across the other four companies, the WELLBY figure looks far less, and likewise with GVA. I appreciate that we do not have the exact figures.
I will come to you first, Alex, just because you are on my right-hand side. Have the other national performing companies given this the same focus? If you say, “Absolutely, yes we have,” why was there not that level of detail from all the NPCs, while allowing the RSNO to lead? What has been going on with that focus on financial sustainability in all the other companies? Do not worry, Alex will be asked about this first, but I will come to the others as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Does that mean that whatever version of this finance committee exists in the next parliamentary session can look forward to this kind of report on a regular basis, if not an annual basis, because I appreciate that there is a cost to preparing such reports?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
I know—sorry. You did not—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michelle Thomson
Okay. Just to get this in the same thread, I want to bring in—