The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1805 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
With respect, local government does not know that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
But that is the same for local government—that is the point that I am making. Local authorities always have a whole range of things and are subjected to the same—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
No. Perhaps I am not being clear, but, for example, there will always be money for transport, because everything would fall apart if folk could not travel from A to B. So, the Scottish Government is able to say, “Within an envelope, we are going to be spending roughly X to Z on transport.” You are not thinking, “I wonder if we will get any money for transport next year.” You are making working assumptions about money that will be in the budget.
What I am saying is, why can you not—or will you not—ring fence money that goes into other areas that you know bring economic growth in the same way you would do for transport? Not everything is on a year-by-year basis. You ring fence money for councils and leave them to manage those in-year budget challenges, but you do not ring fence money for particular areas in your own portfolio, despite the vagaries of all the stuff that is happening.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
For the sake of other committee members I will not labour the point, but I want to pick up on AME versus DEL for pension contributions, which is something that Claire Hughes mentioned earlier. I find it staggering, from a Treasury perspective, that pensions have been going through DEL, given their type and nature. How did we get to that position? That surely cannot be the case for other budgets coming out of Whitehall. It seems staggering.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
That was just out of interest. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will turn to a practical point. I hear what you are saying very clearly. For the record, the quality submissions that you have submitted have been very helpful. We read them all, even though they are extensive.
The planned date for our stage 1 report is December, and we will then have 11 working weeks before the Parliament goes into dissolution for the election that is coming down the line. I would like to hear your reflections on what can be done in the time that we have. Given the timescales and having listened to what you are saying, I think that we are really up against it.
I fully accept the premise that something has to be done, and the bill is something. In other words, all the other people who were party to the issues at Grenfell are getting off scot free. I also hear what you say about not having the hard data to properly estimate the behavioural effects.
However, thinking about the timescales and assuming that the bill gets past stage 1 okay, we will have 11 weeks to try to amend the bill. How practical do you think that is? Bearing in mind what you say about behavioural stuff, if you had to pick your top two or three things that have to be changed or done, what would they be? I would like your sense of where we are at. Fionna, I will come to you first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
You should see how many other bills there are.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
What underpins all of that is the fact that we have a fixed budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
One person’s tinkering is another person’s agility.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
However, the Scottish Government says to local government—and you can track the numbers—that an aggregate percentage has to be ring fenced for an entire session’s policy priority. If you can do that for local government, why can you not do it for yourself, as fiscal discipline?